Partition function of a particle with two harmonic oscillators

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of the partition function for a system with two harmonic oscillators. The confusion arises from the addition of the individual partition functions for each oscillator, where the energies are expressed as E_A and E_B. It is clarified that the total energy levels of the system are not simply the sum of the two oscillators but include all possible states from both oscillators. The correct approach involves recognizing that the partition function can be expressed as the sum of the contributions from both oscillators, leading to the combined exponential factors. Understanding the setup of the system and the definition of the energy levels is crucial for accurately calculating the partition function.
mjmnr3
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Consider now a particle, which can sit in two harmonic oscillators. Oscillator A has
energy levels ε=nhω, and oscillator B has energy levels ε= ε_0 + nhω, where ε_0 > 0 and
n = 0, 1, 2, . . .. The particle can hop freely between the two oscillators, and the available
states for the particle are therefore the harmonic oscillator levels in A and B.

Question b:
Give an expression for the partition function for the particle, when the temperature is T.
What is the probability P that the particle sits in oscillator A?
Relevant Equations
$$
z=\sum_{s} e^{-E(s) / k T}
$$
Here is the solution I have been given:
deleteme7.PNG


But I really don't understand this solution. Why can I just add these two exponential factors (adding two individual partition functions?).-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

if ##E_{A}=n \hbar \omega## and ##E_{B}=n \hbar \omega+\epsilon_{0},## Why is
$$
z=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} e^{-E_{A} / k T}+\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} e^{-E_{B} / K T}=Z_{A}+Z_{B}
$$
Because I would solve it differently. The way Daniel Schroeder (Introduction to thermal physics) teaches you to calculate the partition function is:
##z=\sum_{s}^{\infty} e^{-E(s) / k T}##, where ##s## is the different quantum states of the system. So how does the two exponential factors appear?

I interpret the system's hamiltonian consisting of a sum of the two harmonic oscillators $$\mathrm{H}=\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{A}}+\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{B}}$$, So what I should really find is the eigenvalues to this operator:
$$\hat{H}|s\rangle=E(s)|s\rangle$$
if ##H_{A}## and ##H_{B}## commutes, then they should have simultaneous eigenfunctions and we should expect the energy to be the sum of each hamiltons eigenvalue: ##E(s)= E_{A}+E_{B}##
So in that case, the partition function would be:
$$
z=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} e^{-\left(E_{A}+E_{B}\right) / \kappa T}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} e^{-E_{A} / k T} e^{-E_{B / K T}}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(e^{-n \hbar \omega /(k T)} e^{-n \hbar \omega /(k T)} e^{-\epsilon_{0} /(k T)}\right)
$$
So the issue, is probably that I really don't understand the setup of this system, and what they mean by one particle and two harmonic oscillators.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is the full problem text:
deleteme6.PNG

I use "An introduction to thermal physics" by Daniel V. Schroeder, If you prefer to refer directly to the litterature.
 
For the system in question b, the possible states of the particle are the states of oscillator A as well as the states of oscillator B. So, the possible energies of the particle in question b are the energy levels of A and the energy levels of B.

1609638385245.png


Note that the energy levels for part b are not the sum of the energies of oscillator A and oscillator B. The energy levels in part b are all the energy levels of A and all the energy levels of B.
 
  • Like
Likes mjmnr3
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K