Pascal Principle: Calculating Acceleration & Velocity for Hydraulic Lever

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter luis20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pascal Principle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Pascal's principle in hydraulic systems, specifically focusing on calculating the acceleration and velocity of pistons in a hydraulic lever setup. Participants explore the implications of Pascal's law for fluids in motion versus at rest, and how these concepts relate to mechanical advantage and energy conservation in hydraulic systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Pascal's law applies to fluids in motion, not just at rest, emphasizing that pressure is transmitted equally in all directions regardless of fluid state.
  • Others provide mathematical relationships derived from Pascal's law, such as the equations relating forces and areas of the pistons, and the concept of mechanical advantage (M.A.).
  • A participant questions the relationship between the accelerations of the two pistons, noting that if the area of one piston is double that of the other, the acceleration of the larger piston must be half that of the smaller piston.
  • Another participant discusses the implications of velocity ratios and how they relate to the accelerations of the pistons, suggesting that the acceleration of the smaller piston is twice that of the larger one.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumptions made regarding mass and acceleration, with one participant suggesting that the mass of the larger piston should be four times that of the smaller piston based on the area ratio.
  • Participants explore the conservation of energy in hydraulic systems, discussing how work input equals work output and how this leads to the relationship between force and velocity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the implications of Pascal's law for fluids in motion versus at rest, and participants express differing views on the relationships between acceleration, force, and mass in the hydraulic system. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of these relationships and the assumptions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their assumptions, such as ignoring friction and other real-world factors that may affect the calculations. The discussion also reveals dependencies on specific definitions and conditions related to the hydraulic system being analyzed.

luis20
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Is pascal law only true for fluids at rest?


If I have a hydraulic lever and I put weight on the smaller piston, how can I calculate the acceleration and velocity at which the two pistons move to balance each other?

Thanks for any help !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
luis20 said:
Is pascal law only true for fluids at rest?

Yes Pascal's law is only true for fluids but its not at all necessary that fluids are at rest.

Pascal's law says that pressure applied at the given point in a fluid is transmitted equally in all directions and is independent of the area of the plane of the container perpendicular to the line of action of pressure, in which the fluid is filled.

Pascal has not even mentioned whether fluid is at rest or not.

If I have a hydraulic lever and I put weight on the smaller piston, how can I calculate the acceleration and velocity at which the two pistons move to balance each other?

Thanks for any help !

Take example of hydraulic press. You have a cotton bales at the plank of large area piston and you apply force on the small area piston. Let the area of large piston is A and that of smaller piston is "a". Let you apply force f on the small piston and the resultant force on larger piston comes out to be F. Then by Pascal's law , we have :

F/A = f/a
F/f = A/a
As A>a so resultant F>f. So we get "gain in force".

Also Mechanical Advantage (next time M.A. to be brief) is calculated as:
You apply f force thus imparting "P" pressure to small piston :

P=f/a
or f=Pa

Also

P=F/A
F=PA

Now M.A. = F/f = A/a

Also Work input equals work output. If change in time is held same , we have :
So Power input = Power output
FV = fv
Since you can get velocities , you can easily obtain acceleration.
 
sankalpmittal said:
Yes Pascal's law is only true for fluids but its not at all necessary that fluids are at rest.

Pascal's law says that pressure applied at the given point in a fluid is transmitted equally in all directions and is independent of the area of the plane of the container perpendicular to the line of action of pressure, in which the fluid is filled.

Pascal has not even mentioned whether fluid is at rest or not.
Take example of hydraulic press. You have a cotton bales at the plank of large area piston and you apply force on the small area piston. Let the area of large piston is A and that of smaller piston is "a". Let you apply force f on the small piston and the resultant force on larger piston comes out to be F. Then by Pascal's law , we have :

F/A = f/a
F/f = A/a
As A>a so resultant F>f. So we get "gain in force".

Also Mechanical Advantage (next time M.A. to be brief) is calculated as:
You apply f force thus imparting "P" pressure to small piston :

P=f/a
or f=Pa

Also

P=F/A
F=PA

Now M.A. = F/f = A/a

Also Work input equals work output. If change in time is held same , we have :
So Power input = Power output
FV = fv
Since you can get velocities , you can easily obtain acceleration.
But, look at this.

Imagine A is the double of "a", according to Pascal F is also the double of "f". When the smaller piston goes down "h", the larger piston goes up "h/2". So the acceleration of the larger piston has to be half the acceleration of the smaller piston. If so, how can F be the double of "f", since F=ma and this "a" is half the other one?
 
luis20 said:
But, look at this.

Imagine A is the double of "a", according to Pascal F is also the double of "f". When the smaller piston goes down "h", the larger piston goes up "h/2". So the acceleration of the larger piston has to be half the acceleration of the smaller piston. If so, how can F be the double of "f", since F=ma and this "a" is half the other one?

For a moment , forget about F=ma. Now if F=2f , then according to Pascal's law , we have :

FV = fv
F/f = v/V
v=2V (Velocity ratio = M.A. =2 )

Velocity of smaller piston by which it moves is twice the velocity of which larger piston moves.
So as the two piston's start from rest and the change of time is held same , we will have :

a = v/Δt
A= V/Δt

So we can say that a=2A
Or , acceleration in smaller piston is twice of larger one.

Now , we have "F=ma"
(i) F = MA
(ii) f=ma

Since a=2A
Now on dividing the two we have :
F/f = M/2m

Now we get relationship of forces applied on pistons to the masses of pistons.

Now take the case in which F=2f
2= M/2m
4m = M

Which is of course true ! Mass of larger piston > Mass of smaller piston. M>m.

Hope this helps...
 
sankalpmittal said:
For a moment , forget about F=ma. Now if F=2f , then according to Pascal's law , we have :

FV = fv
F/f = v/V
v=2V (Velocity ratio = M.A. =2 )

Velocity of smaller piston by which it moves is twice the velocity of which larger piston moves.
So as the two piston's start from rest and the change of time is held same , we will have :

a = v/Δt
A= V/Δt

So we can say that a=2A
Or , acceleration in smaller piston is twice of larger one.

Now , we have "F=ma"
(i) F = MA
(ii) f=ma

Since a=2A
Now on dividing the two we have :
F/f = M/2m

Now we get relationship of forces applied on pistons to the masses of pistons.

Now take the case in which F=2f
2= M/2m
4m = M

Which is of course true ! Mass of larger piston > Mass of smaller piston. M>m.

Hope this helps...

Oh, I never saw FV=fv, how do you get that relationship. You came up with the conclusion that the mass of the larger piston is 4 times larger than the smaller piston, is that true o_O? (If area doubles, mass should double)

Thanks for the help ! :)
 
luis20 said:
Oh, I never saw FV=fv, how do you get that relationship. You came up with the conclusion that the mass of the larger piston is 4 times larger than the smaller piston, is that true o_O? (If area doubles, mass should double)

Thanks for the help ! :)

See my post #2 again. Considering the hydraulic press to be an ideal machine (ignore friction and all...) the law of conservation of energy will hold true. So energy before and after the conversion will remain same. So Work done on the machine will be same as work done by the machine. Hence , we have :

FD=fd where D and d are distance moved respectively. On dividing both side by Δt or same change in time , we obtain :

FD/Δt = fd/Δt
FV=fv

Or Power in equals power out. Power is defined as dot product of force and velocity. Here they're in same direction so we obtain power as force times velocity.

Since we obtain that if F=2f then d=2D.
Also A=2a ( Here a is area and not acceleration !)
Then we obtain

AD = ad (Note : I used your scenario to get this relation. However its true for all scenarios : http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/WindTunnel/Activities/Pascals_principle.html)

(verification :
LHS :
2ad/2 = ad = RHS)

So we can say that :
V1 = v2
(the volume of fluid pushed down on the left side equals the volume of fluid that is lifted up on the right side , true for all the cases here.)

Now the area of larger piston is double of area of smaller one , but you cannot say the same thing about its mass. This is because mass is not uniform at its every point.

We can then say that

Since acceleration in smaller piston equals to twice of acceleration in larger piston ; and force applied on smaller piston is half of force generated in larger piston ,

Since acceleration in smaller piston=2 times Acceleration in larger piston , and F=M times acceleration in larger piston
and
f= m times acceleration in smaller piston

Now on dividing the two we have :
F/f = M/2m
As F=2f
So
M=4m

We get this ! You took the ratio as too much positive integer. In real machines its just difficult to get. Moreover friction etc. also play a role in calculation.

Generalizing this ,
F/f = MA/ma
Since F>f ,so MA>ma
You cannot just precisely evaluate the ratio of mass. In your scenario you took F=2f , so I said that M=4m.

Hope this helps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K