Ok, I have a question about this Fade'ev Popov procedure of teasing out the ghosts when one quantizes a non-Abelian gauge theory with path integrals.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The factor of 1 that people insert, for some gauge fixing function f, and some non-Abelian symmetry [tex]\mathcal{G}[/tex] is:

[tex]1=\int \mathcal{D}U \delta[f(\mathbf{A})] \Delta[\mathbf{A}] [/tex],

where

[tex]\mathcal{D}U = \Pi d\theta[/tex],

and

[tex]U \in \mathcal{G}[/tex].

This is probably a stupid question, but the function [tex]\Delta[/tex] works out just to be a Jacobian of some sort over the manifold [tex]\mathcal{G}[/tex], right?

[tex]\Delta[\mathbf{A}] = det \left(\frac{\delta f}{\delta \theta}\right)[/tex]

I am confused because no one actually says this. Am I completely off base?

Thanks in advance for helping me, and tolerating a (possibly) stupid question!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Path Integrals and Non-Abelian Gauge Theories

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Path Integrals Abelian | Date |
---|---|

I A Proof of Kaku (8.18). | Wednesday at 6:22 AM |

I Path Integrals in Quantum Theory | Apr 9, 2018 |

I Random measurements in QED? | Jan 25, 2018 |

A Path Integral of a Spontaneously Broken Theory | Jan 7, 2018 |

I Feynman path integral | Nov 14, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**