PE & KE Problem: Work, PE & KE Calcs

  • Thread starter Thread starter vysero
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block sliding along a frictionless loop-the-loop, requiring calculations of work done by gravitational force and gravitational potential energy at various points along the path. The subject area includes concepts of potential energy (PE), kinetic energy (KE), and work in the context of mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the heights of various points in the loop and how to calculate work and potential energy based on those heights. There is confusion regarding the interpretation of the height at point Q and how it relates to the overall problem setup.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants attempting to clarify the heights at points P and Q. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculation of heights, but there is still uncertainty about the correct application of formulas and the implications of initial conditions.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the gravitational potential energy being defined as zero at the bottom of the loop, which may influence how participants approach the calculations. Additionally, the original poster expresses uncertainty about the relationship between work, potential energy, and initial velocity.

vysero
Messages
134
Reaction score
0
Fig. 8-31.png

In Fig. 8-31, a small block of mass m = 0.032 kg can slide along the frictionless loop-the-loop, with loop radius R = 12cm. The block is released from rest at point P, at height h = 5.0R above the bottom of the loop. How much work does the gravitational force do on the block as the block travels from point P to (a) point Q and (b) the top of the loop? If the gravitational potential energy of the block-Earth system is taken to be zero at the bottom of the loop, what is that potential energy when the block is (c) at point P, (d) at point Q, and (e) at the top of the loop? (f) If, instead of merely being released, the block is given some initial speed downward along the track, do the answers to (a) through (e) increase, decrease, or remain the same?
I believe that the relevant equations are:
w=fd and w=mgh and maybe ke=1/2mv^2

Well I believe if I could figure out what the the specific heights at the given points are then I could make some calculations for instance: (a) If I new what the height at point Q was I would say the work would be mgh but I am having trouble understanding what they want me to do with the given height being 5.0R! Also, I believe the answer to (f) is remain the same right because work and PE don't have anything to do with velocity.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The heights of points P and Q are clearly given in the diagram: h and R respectively, and you know h = 5R.
Q appears to be intended as the height of the centre of curvature of the final loop. The radius is given as R, so what would the height of the top of the loop be?
 
Well let's start with the height at Q. The height at is 5R or 5*12cm which is 60cm. So then point Q is 60cm - 12cm which is 48cm right? That's .48m and if w = mgh then it should be (.032)(9.8)(.48) = .150528 J which doesn't seem right to me.
 
vysero said:
Well let's start with the height at Q. The height at is 5R or 5*12cm which is 60cm. So then point Q is 60cm - 12cm which is 48cm right? That's .48m and if w = mgh then it should be (.032)(9.8)(.48) = .150528 J which doesn't seem right to me.
No, P is 5R above the bottom of the loop, and Q is R above the bottom of the loop. Q is 48cm below P, but I think they want the PE relative to 0 at the bottom of the loop.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K