PE of Hanging Cord: Solve 8th Ed. Ch.8 pr.35

  • Thread starter Thread starter TimH
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a cord of mass 15g and length 25cm that transitions from a horizontal position attached to a ceiling to a vertical hanging position. The task is to determine the change in potential energy due to this change in orientation, with a hint suggesting the use of a differential slice and integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to set up an integral to calculate the potential energy in both orientations but expresses confusion regarding the correct formulation. They question their understanding of the potential energy of a differential slice of the cord.
  • Some participants clarify the need to consider the mass per unit length when calculating the potential energy of a slice, leading to a revised equation for the differential potential energy.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing clarifications that help refine the original poster's approach. There is a recognition of the need to adjust the equation used for the potential energy of a differential slice, which appears to have led to a breakthrough in understanding.

Contextual Notes

The problem is noted as being challenging, indicated by its "three star" rating in the textbook, and there is an emphasis on correctly setting up the integral to find the change in potential energy.

TimH
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is Halliday and Resnick 8th Ed. Ch.8 pr.35. You have a cord of mass 15g and length 25cm that is stuck to a ceiling. Later it hangs vertically from one end. What is the change in potential energy of the cord due to the change in orientation? The problem as a hint says to consider a differential slice of the cord and use an integral.


Homework Equations



Potential Gravitational Energy = m g y, where y is the height above the reference point.


The Attempt at a Solution



Okay this is a "three star" problem in the book (=hard), probably because you have to set up the integral, which I can't seem to do for some stupid reason-- there is something (probably basic) I am not getting. We want the change in potential energy so we need to compute the PE in the two orientations and subtract to get the difference.

When the cord is hanging vertically it is .25m long so we will use the bottom of the (vertical) cord as the reference point for zero potential energy. So when the rope is stuck to the ceiling (and I assume they mean it is stuck horizontally to the ceiling, otherwise there is no "change in orientation") the potential energy is m g h, with h being .25m since it is this high above the reference point. This gives a PE of .015kg * 9.8m/s^2 * .25m = .03675 J.

Now for when the rope is hanging vertically. The potential energy of a differential slice of the rope is U= m g x dx. [Yes?] So the integral as we move up the cord is:

mg * [integral from 0 to .25] x dx. This is mg * [(x^2)/2] evaluated at .25 = .00459 J. This value seems to be way too small and leads to a wrong answer when you subtract it from the first PE. I'm computing the area under the curve U=mg x, which is going to be small because I'm squaring fractions of a meter. So I'm confused setting this up somehow.

The correct final answer is .018 J, which is half the PE of the horizontal cord, so the PE of the hanging cord is .018. Now if we imagine that all the mass of the hanging cord were at a point halfway between the bottom (zero PE) point and the ceiling, then we get this correct answer. But what is wrong with my integral? (There's probably something dumb I'm missing). Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi TimH! :smile:
TimH said:
Now for when the rope is hanging vertically. The potential energy of a differential slice of the rope is U= m g x dx. [Yes?]

(There's probably something dumb I'm missing).

That's no … and yes. :wink:

U= (m/L) g x dx. :rolleyes:
 
Okay I think I get it. Since I want an equation for the gravitational potential of a slice = dx, its got to have a slice of the mass, not the whole thing, so its the total mass divided by the length for a mass-per-length. I did it out with your equation and got the right answer. Thanks! Would it be more correct to say the equation is dU= (m/L) g x dx? I just mean its giving you the differential element of potential for a change dx, yes?
 
TimH said:
Okay I think I get it. Since I want an equation for the gravitational potential of a slice = dx, its got to have a slice of the mass, not the whole thing, so its the total mass divided by the length for a mass-per-length. I did it out with your equation and got the right answer. Thanks! Would it be more correct to say the equation is dU= (m/L) g x dx? I just mean its giving you the differential element of potential for a change dx, yes?

Yes, that's exactly right! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K