Peltier thermopar for hand heat charging battery

  • Thread starter Thread starter mitro
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using a Peltier thermoelectric generator to harness heat from the human hand for charging batteries, particularly in low-power devices like watches or small flashlights. Participants explore the theoretical and practical aspects of this concept, including energy output, efficiency, and comparisons to other energy sources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that increasing the number of Peltier elements while decreasing their size could enhance energy output.
  • Others argue that using hand heat to charge a battery may not yield sufficient energy, proposing alternatives like mechanical generators instead.
  • One participant believes that a Peltier device could provide enough power to operate low-energy devices like phones or smartwatches if energy consumption is reduced.
  • Questions are raised about the actual energy output from a Peltier device when using a human hand as a heat source, with requests for calculations to support claims.
  • Some participants share personal experiences with similar technologies, such as a hand-powered flashlight, noting its limitations in power output.
  • Discussions include the efficiency of Peltier devices, with some participants estimating very low power outputs based on body heat generation.
  • Historical context is provided regarding the invention of Peltier devices and their potential for improvement with new materials.
  • Concerns are expressed about the practicality and efficiency of using body heat for energy generation, with references to specific power requirements for devices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on the feasibility of using hand heat to charge batteries. Some believe it is possible for low-power devices, while others challenge the practicality and efficiency of such an approach.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved calculations regarding energy output and efficiency of Peltier devices, as well as assumptions about heat loss and energy recovery from the human body.

  • #31
mitro said:
Now idea is simple, perhaps it will turn out like this?
I have not seen any real examples of such devices.View attachment 369006
A 'flexible semiconductor' of any significant length would not provide local cooling and, as stated above, would be inefficient. Semiconductor devices are usually very thin for this reason. Also some of the heat would be dissipated right next to the item you wanted to cool. The idea is actually off-topic for this thread.

If you are just after a low thermal resistance path then a good thermal conductor would be best (or a circulating fluid perhaps). Heat pipes were invented a few years ago and would do what you propose without any heat - electricity conversion. They work better than a copper bar, for instance and have the advantage of being made curved to fit inside electronics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
8K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K