Pendulum attached to a rotating vertical disk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the invariance of the pendulum mass coordinates when using a different Cartesian coordinate system, specifically one rotated counterclockwise by 90 degrees. The user confirms that they derived the same coordinates for the pendulum mass in both systems. A response clarifies the coordinate system's orientation, affirming that the x-axis is positive to the right and the y-axis is positive up. The equations provided illustrate the relationship between the coordinates and the pendulum's motion. The conversation highlights the consistency of coordinate transformations in physics.
member 731016
Homework Statement
I try to derive coordinates for a mass on a rotating pendulum using a different coordinate system
Relevant Equations
$$(x,y)$$
For this problem,
nBGOVfUox0x9n0dkz5EMPFanasHH6gtnK2EIj5snnUjWHO3YJ0.png

I correctly got the same coordinates for the pendulum mass using another coordinate system. The coordinate system I used was the other coordinate system rotated counterclockwise by 90 degrees. Why is the pendulum mass coordinates invariant in my cartesian coordinate system (x̄,ȳ)?

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: I try to derive coordinates for a mass on a rotating pendulum using a different coordinate system
Relevant Equations: $$(x,y)$$

For this problem,
View attachment 343207
I correctly got the same coordinates for the pendulum mass using another coordinate system. The coordinate system I used was the other coordinate system rotated counterclockwise by 90 degrees. Why is the pendulum mass coordinates invariant in my cartesian coordinate system (x̄,ȳ)?

Thanks for any help!
Do you mean that your system was x positive to the right and y positive up?
In that system it would be ##x=a\cos(\omega t)+b\sin(\theta)##, ##y=a\sin(\omega t)-b\cos(\theta)##.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
haruspex said:
Do you mean that your system was x positive to the right and y positive up?
In that system it would be ##x=a\cos(\omega t)+b\sin(\theta)##, ##y=a\sin(\omega t)-b\cos(\theta)##.
Thank you for your reply @haruspex!

Yes you are correct!

Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top