Penrose Diagram for Schwarzschild

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the construction of Penrose diagrams for Schwarzschild space-time, specifically using advanced and retarded Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates. Participants explore the challenges of conformally compactifying the metric to facilitate the drawing of Penrose diagrams without relying solely on Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the Schwarzschild metric and the complications that arise with radial null curves as r approaches 2M, proposing the use of tortoise coordinates to address this issue.
  • Another participant suggests that detailed transformations are unnecessary for sketching a Penrose diagram, implying that basic features like horizons and singularity lines are sufficient.
  • A participant emphasizes the need for a coordinate transformation that allows for compactification of the spacetime in advanced or retarded Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates, distinct from the Kruskal extension.
  • One participant mentions a reference that may provide the necessary equations for transforming Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates into a Penrose diagram, suggesting it could be relevant to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the level of detail required for constructing Penrose diagrams, with some advocating for a simpler approach while others insist on the necessity of specific coordinate transformations for accuracy.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the appropriate coordinate transformations needed to achieve a finite coordinate range for the Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates, as well as the implications of using these coordinates versus Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates.

coalquay404
Messages
217
Reaction score
1
Hi. I've got a quick question on Penrose diagrams for the Schwarzschild space-time that I'd appreciate some comments on. In standard [tex](t,r,\theta,\phi)[/tex] coordinates the Schwarzschild metric is

[tex]ds^2 = -\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)dt^2 + \left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)^{-1}dr^2 + r^2 d\Omega^2.[/tex]

The immediate difficulty with this is that if one looks at radial null curves one finds that the light cones appear to close up as [tex]r\to 2M[/tex]. The standard way of getting around this is to define a tortoise radial coordinate according to

[tex]r^* \equiv r + 2M\log|r-2M|.[/tex]

Then the metric in [tex](t,r^*,\theta,\phi)[/tex] coordinates becomes simply

[tex]ds^2 = \left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)(-dt^2 + dr^{*2}) + r^2 d\Omega^2.[/tex]

The thing about this radial coordinate is that the light cones don't close up anywhere. The downside, however, is that the surface [tex]r=2M[/tex] has now been pushed to [tex]r^*\to-\infty[/tex]. So, we introduce advanced and retarded Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates by defining

[tex]v \equiv t + r^*,[/tex]
[tex]u \equiv t - r^*.[/tex]

Then, for example, the metric in [tex](u,r,\theta,\phi)[/tex] coordinates becomes

[tex]ds^2 = -\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)du^2 - 2dudr + r^2d\Omega^2.[/tex]

(I think this is correct.) Now to my question. Is there any way that I can conformally compactify this metric so that I can draw a Penrose diagram of it? I know that I can go to Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates and construct a Penrose diagram there, but surely it's possible to construct Penrose diagrams using just [tex](u,r,\theta,\phi)[/tex] or [tex](v,r,\theta,\phi)[/tex] coordinates. My problem is that I can't readily see what coordinate transformations I should take so as to get to a finite coordinate range from the infinite ranges of [tex]u,v,r[/tex]. Can anyone shed some light on this for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pervect said:
You don't need that much detail for a penrose diagram.

You do if you want to do it correctly. I'm not talking about simply drawing the bare Penrose diagram. What I'm after is a coordinate transformation which will compactify the spacetime so that it can be drawn as a Penrose diagram. I'm *not* looking to draw the entire Penrose diagram for the Kruskal extension that you quoted in the first link. What I want to be able to do is to draw a Penrose diagram that arises from using advanced *or* retarded Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates. This would correspond to the right-hand region in the Penrose diagram for the Kruskal extension, but there would be only one singularity (the singularity is on the bottom for the retarded coordinate and on the top for the advanced coordinate).
 
While I've never gone through it in the level of detail you want to, the second reference I quoted appears to do the job, i.e.

http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/schwp.html#penrose

has the equations that transform Kruskal-Szekeres into a penrose diagram, also it also has a GIF graphic that shows one morphing into the other.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K