Perceiving near c speeds from a great distance

  • Thread starter jam.muskopf
  • Start date
In summary: So while there is doubtless something special about the very distant stars, it's not their speed that makes them special.
  • #1
jam.muskopf
9
0
When we look at stars that are far away from earth, they appear to be still in the sky. However, these stars are probably moving at very high velocities relative to earth; we are just so far away that they appear to be still.
What if there was a star that was very, very far away, but it was very bright, so we could see it just fine, and this star was moving .9999999c in the Earth's frame of reference. However, the distance from the star is so great that appears to be moving rather slowly to people on earth. Is this situation possible? It seems to me that there should be some sort of problem with perceiving the fastest possible velocities as slow if you look at them from far away. Am I thinking about this incorrectly, or is there some sort of special relativity implication that changes this situation?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
With the naked eye, we only see stars that are within a few hundred light years. If it was going at c, we'd notice it actually move in the sky over a few years. The only exception would be if it is heading straight for us, in which case, the Doppler shift would make it very much obvious that the star is going that fast.

Going to stars only visible in telescope, it doesn't change much. The star would still have to be in our galaxy, so that's maybe 10-20 thousand light years. That's still close enough to detect such rapid motion.

So no. None of the stars we know about could possibly be going that fast.
 
  • #3
Following on K^2's observation, at 20,000 light years, lateral motion at near c would manifest as a change in position of about 65 arcseconds per year. That would be an enormously visible change (I think even milliarcseconds per year would be detectible). Then, as noted, if most of the motion was towards or away, the Doppler would be a dead giveaway.

A quick search turns up that 65 arcseconds per year is 6 times the largest angular speed observed for any star; and that largest angular speed is for Barnard's star (6 ly away), the second closest star to the sun.
 

1. How is it possible to perceive near light-speed objects from a great distance?

According to the theory of relativity, time and space are interconnected and can be distorted by the presence of massive objects. When an object travels near the speed of light, it also distorts the space around it, allowing us to perceive it from a great distance.

2. Can humans actually perceive objects traveling at near light-speed?

While it is not possible for humans to physically travel at near light-speed, we can perceive objects that are traveling at these speeds through advanced technologies such as telescopes and satellites.

3. How far can we perceive objects traveling at near light-speed?

The distance at which we can perceive objects traveling at near light-speed depends on various factors such as the object's velocity, our technological capabilities, and the object's brightness. In some cases, we can perceive objects that are billions of light-years away.

4. Are there any risks associated with perceiving near light-speed objects from a great distance?

There are no known risks associated with perceiving near light-speed objects from a great distance. However, it is important to use caution and protective measures when observing objects with powerful technologies to avoid any potential harm.

5. What can we learn from perceiving near light-speed objects from a great distance?

Studying objects that are traveling at near light-speed can provide valuable insights into the nature of the universe and help us better understand concepts such as space, time, and gravity. It also allows us to observe and study distant galaxies and cosmic phenomena that would otherwise be impossible to see.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
544
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
797
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
796
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
4K
Back
Top