Perceiving near c speeds from a great distance

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jam.muskopf
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the perception of stars moving at relativistic speeds, specifically .9999999c, from vast distances. It concludes that while stars may appear stationary due to their immense distance, their actual velocities would still be detectable through angular motion and Doppler shifts. At a distance of 20,000 light years, a star moving at near light speed would exhibit a measurable change in position of approximately 65 arcseconds per year, which exceeds the largest observed angular speed of any known star, Barnard's star. Therefore, no known stars can be moving at such high velocities without being detectable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity and its implications on motion and perception
  • Familiarity with angular measurements in astronomy, specifically arcseconds
  • Knowledge of Doppler effect and its application in astrophysics
  • Basic astronomy concepts, including the distances to stars and their visibility
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of special relativity on astronomical observations
  • Study the Doppler effect in the context of light and sound waves
  • Explore angular motion and measurement techniques in astronomy
  • Investigate the characteristics and velocities of stars, focusing on Barnard's star
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of physics interested in the effects of relativistic speeds on celestial observations and the implications of special relativity in astronomy.

jam.muskopf
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
When we look at stars that are far away from earth, they appear to be still in the sky. However, these stars are probably moving at very high velocities relative to earth; we are just so far away that they appear to be still.
What if there was a star that was very, very far away, but it was very bright, so we could see it just fine, and this star was moving .9999999c in the Earth's frame of reference. However, the distance from the star is so great that appears to be moving rather slowly to people on earth. Is this situation possible? It seems to me that there should be some sort of problem with perceiving the fastest possible velocities as slow if you look at them from far away. Am I thinking about this incorrectly, or is there some sort of special relativity implication that changes this situation?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With the naked eye, we only see stars that are within a few hundred light years. If it was going at c, we'd notice it actually move in the sky over a few years. The only exception would be if it is heading straight for us, in which case, the Doppler shift would make it very much obvious that the star is going that fast.

Going to stars only visible in telescope, it doesn't change much. The star would still have to be in our galaxy, so that's maybe 10-20 thousand light years. That's still close enough to detect such rapid motion.

So no. None of the stars we know about could possibly be going that fast.
 
Following on K^2's observation, at 20,000 light years, lateral motion at near c would manifest as a change in position of about 65 arcseconds per year. That would be an enormously visible change (I think even milliarcseconds per year would be detectible). Then, as noted, if most of the motion was towards or away, the Doppler would be a dead giveaway.

A quick search turns up that 65 arcseconds per year is 6 times the largest angular speed observed for any star; and that largest angular speed is for Barnard's star (6 ly away), the second closest star to the sun.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K