Percentage energy loss (mechanical energy) problem

AI Thread Summary
An object with a mass of 2.0 kg slides down a low-friction incline, reaching a speed of 2.7 m/s at the bottom from a height of 0.50 m. The problem involves calculating the percentage energy loss during this process. The initial approach used the equation mgh(0) + W(other forces) = 0.5mv^2, but the calculations did not yield the correct answer. Suggestions include ensuring the energy loss is calculated by subtracting the initial potential energy from the final kinetic energy and converting the result to a percentage. Detailed calculations are necessary to identify any mistakes in the approach.
poopandpee
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Problem: An object with mass 2.0 kg slides down a low-friction incline and its speed measured at the bottom is 2.7 m/s. The object starts sliding at a height of 0.50 m over the tabletop and its speed is measured 0.10 m over the tabletop. How big is the percentage energy loss?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt: I've tried using this formula: mgh(0) + W(other forces) = 0.5mv2, where m=2.0 kg, h=0.4 m, and v=2.7 Then I found W(other forces) and divided it by mgh(0). However, that did not give a right answer. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sign of the energy loss is a bit questionable but overall the approach is good. Maybe some mistake in the calculations? You didn't show them.
 
Did you remember to multiply by 100 to convert to %?
 
You shouldn't divide by the other work, if your equation above is correct you should subtract mgh(0) to get W alone
 
NateTheGreatt77 said:
You shouldn't divide by the other work, if your equation above is correct you should subtract mgh(0) to get W alone
That appears to be what @poopandpee did before dividing:
poopandpee said:
Then I found W(other forces)
As others have posted, the method sounds correct, but we need to see the details.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top