Permitivity and Permeability: What's the Difference and When Do We Use Them?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dervast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Permeability
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Permittivity and permeability are fundamental concepts in electromagnetism, with permittivity (ε₀) relating to electric fields and permeability (μ₀) to magnetic fields. The relative permittivity and permeability describe how materials respond to electric and magnetic fields, respectively, with relative permittivity often referred to as the dielectric constant. The speed of light in a vacuum is determined by the relationship between these two constants, specifically through the equation c = 1/√(ε₀μ₀). Understanding these properties is crucial for applications in electrical engineering and physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic electromagnetism concepts
  • Familiarity with the speed of light and its relation to electromagnetic properties
  • Knowledge of dielectric materials and their properties
  • Basic understanding of tensors and scalars in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of relative permittivity and its applications in dielectric materials
  • Study the relationship between permittivity, permeability, and the speed of light in various media
  • Explore the implications of permittivity and permeability in antenna theory
  • Investigate the calculation methods for permittivity and permeability of different materials
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, physicists, and anyone interested in the principles of electromagnetism and their applications in technology.

dervast
Messages
132
Reaction score
1
Hi i am trying to frigure out the similarities and differences between permitivity and permeability? When do we use the one or another term?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Permitivity pertains to electric fields, and permeability pertains to magnetic fields. What textbook are you using for this anyway?
 
So its the same thing but the first term is for electricity and the second one for magneticity
 
permitivity is eo and permetabilty is m0 right?
 
dervast said:
Hi i am trying to frigure out the similarities and differences between permitivity and permeability? When do we use the one or another term?
It's permiTTivity :)

Although this is a very good question, you really should have asked about the RELATIVE permeability and permittivity.

Why ? Well, because the the "permeability and permittivity" are just the units or the "permeability and permittivity" of the vacuum. If one talks about relativity permittivity of 3.9, than one really means 3.9 times the permittivity of the vacuum.

Now, what are these guys ? Well, they are indeed quite similar since permittivity refers to "electrical phenomena" and permeability refers to "magnetic phenomena".

Let's take the (relative) permittivity. Basically, this quantity refers to how much electrical charge an object can store once you apply a voltage onto it. In other words, it expresses how an object "reacts" through rearrangement of the electronic distribution of the material, if you apply an E-field onto it. As an example, just think of what happens if you apply a voltage onto a medium with 5 plus and 5 minus charges. The charges will separate. There is another, more famous quantity that expresses this : ie the dielectric constant. This actually is the relative permittivity of a dielectric (ie a polarizable medium).

The exact same thing exists for magnetic media. Keep in mind that the electrons are NOT represented by magnetic monopoles ! This is the only assymetry between electrical and magnetic phenomena.

regards
marlon
 
One thing that separates the two is that permittivity is a scalar and permeability is a tensor.
 
That's not true- both the permittivity and permeability may be tensor-valued.
 
The speed of light, 2.9979 x 108 meters / sec, is equal to the inverse square root of the product of e0 and u0. The impedance of free space, 377 ohms, is equal to the square root of the ratio of u0 / e0. Virtually every material has a dielectric constant and index of refraction > 1, both associated with e0, while very few materials have a relative permeability u > 1 (magnetic materials), associated with u0. e0 is associated with charge, while u0 is associated with currents.
 
Can someone help me to know the same difference but referred to hydraulic flow rate? thanks!
 
  • #10
Bob S said:
The speed of light, 2.9979 x 108 meters / sec, is equal to the inverse square root of the product of e0 and u0. The impedance of free space, 377 ohms, is equal to the square root of the ratio of u0 / e0. Virtually every material has a dielectric constant and index of refraction > 1, both associated with e0, while very few materials have a relative permeability u > 1 (magnetic materials), associated with u0. e0 is associated with charge, while u0 is associated with currents.

Where did you get the idea that the impedance of "free space" is 377 Ohms? Since impedance is defined as "the total resistance in [any] circuit," that would mean that the impedance of free space would exceed several million Ohms, provided my DVM probes aren't so close together that they electrically short.
 
  • #11
Think of permittivity and permeability as "bang for your buck" constants. That is, how much E or B field you get for a given amount of charge at some velocity, v. Permittivity applies to E fields, permeability applies to B fields.

P.S. Glen, Bob S. is correct, the impedance of free space is ~377 ohms.

Claude.
 
  • #12
Glen Bartusch said:
Where did you get the idea that the impedance of "free space" is 377 Ohms?

From e.g. any book which includes a chapter on basic antenna theory.
And the 377 Ohms of space can "short" a circuit when you are working at high frequencies, so it is a "proper" impedance;
 
  • #13
How we calculate permitivity and permeability of free space?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K