Petroleum or Aerospace Engineering? I'm torn.

In summary, the conversation discusses the decision of a transfer student with freshman equivalent credits to choose between pursuing a passion for space exploration or going into the field of petroleum engineering for financial stability. The student expresses concern about the future of the space industry due to economic and political factors, while also acknowledging the continued demand for oil. The conversation also touches on the differences between petroleum engineering and chemical engineering, and the current job market for the petroleum industry.
  • #1
y0nkers
3
0
I'm currently a transfer student with about freshman equivalent credits. I'm taking all the basic classes required for most engineering degrees (Calc I-III, Chemistry, English, Physics, etc). I am now at the point where I NEED to decide which one I want to do.

I have a deep love for space and space travel. It thrills me. Being a part of NASA or another space exploration company would be a dream come true. However, the future is looking bleak in that area. I've heard many predictions of continued and escalated economic despair. The ignorance of many politicians and the general public will lead to further cuts for NASA if things get worse. Many of the private companies rely heavily on NASA so that could mean goodbye for them too (SpaceX etc).

Nevertheless, the need for oil hasn't been greater. Crude prices continue to rise leaving a oil companies nurtured and flourishing. I cannot see this stopping anytime soon (can you?). A job as a Petroleum Engineer will give my mathematical brain the stimulation it needs while leaving me completely comfortable and flexible monetarily.

If I was a religious man I would say something cheesy along the lines of "the Devil and God are raging inside of me."

What are your thoughts PF? Should I take the risk of pursuing my passion that has an uncertain future or should I go towards the $$? Obviously most people are going to suggest the previous, but with the way things are headed, is this even reasonable?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
you couldn't pick two fields that are more different. petro is based in ChE and aero in MechE. which of those two would you rather major in?
 
  • #3
Highway said:
you couldn't pick two fields that are more different. petro is based in ChE and aero in MechE. which of those two would you rather major in?
i used to be in petro and that is not true
 
  • #4
nickadams said:
i used to be in petro and that is not true

at my school the departments are connected. . .
 
  • #5
y0nkers said:
I'm currently a transfer student with about freshman equivalent credits. I'm taking all the basic classes required for most engineering degrees (Calc I-III, Chemistry, English, Physics, etc). I am now at the point where I NEED to decide which one I want to do.

I have a deep love for space and space travel. It thrills me. Being a part of NASA or another space exploration company would be a dream come true. However, the future is looking bleak in that area. I've heard many predictions of continued and escalated economic despair. The ignorance of many politicians and the general public will lead to further cuts for NASA if things get worse. Many of the private companies rely heavily on NASA so that could mean goodbye for them too (SpaceX etc).

Nevertheless, the need for oil hasn't been greater. Crude prices continue to rise leaving a oil companies nurtured and flourishing. I cannot see this stopping anytime soon (can you?). A job as a Petroleum Engineer will give my mathematical brain the stimulation it needs while leaving me completely comfortable and flexible monetarily.

If I was a religious man I would say something cheesy along the lines of "the Devil and God are raging inside of me."

What are your thoughts PF? Should I take the risk of pursuing my passion that has an uncertain future or should I go towards the $$? Obviously most people are going to suggest the previous, but with the way things are headed, is this even reasonable?

Thanks

I do. The reserves are surely one day going to get low causing slowed down production. As far last time I heard from some random mouth, petroleum sector is not experiencing any growth at all. It's just static. Aero industry depends on the orders from customers for e.g Boeing says thousands of jobs in America will be created from Emirates' order for 90 777-300ERs
 
  • #6
Highway said:
at my school the departments are connected. . .

cool story bro
 
  • #7
nickadams said:
cool story bro

it's also the first school with a petro engineering department (from 1910) so i imagine i know what they are doing.

the cracking furnace used to break down crude oil is a chemical process, why do you think petro is unrelated to chemical engineering?
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Highway said:
it's also the first school with a petro engineering department (from 1910) so i imagine i know what they are doing.

the cracking furnace used to break down crude oil is a chemical process, why do you think petro is unrelated to chemical engineering?

i agree they are related but the coursework for petroE and chemE are very different at least in my experience.


http://www.pe.tamu.edu/Current-Students/Catalogs/PETE_curriculum_133.pdf

http://www.che.tamu.edu/media/35925/ugrad_curriculum.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
nickadams said:
i agree they are related but the coursework for petroE and chemE are very different at least in my experience.


http://www.pe.tamu.edu/Current-Students/Catalogs/PETE_curriculum_133.pdf

http://www.che.tamu.edu/media/35925/ugrad_curriculum.pdf

wooooooooooooow, you guys take a lot of specialized and applied geology courses which is awesome, but i can't believe you don't have to take organic chem -- something that crude oil is.

i guess a lot of the ChE process and core classes are covered in the applied classes like reservoirs, etc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
At my university Petroleum engineering is focused on drilling and pumping the oil out, it's a lot more geology and mechanics, it doesn't focus at all on petroleum refining.
The refining part, cracking and all that is for us Chemical engineers.

The overlap is mainly in the part of mass and heat transfer and thermodynamics(but we see things like equilibrium with chemical reactions that I don't think they do), especially the property of fluids, equations of state, phase diagrams...
But Petroleum guys don't learn anything about chemistry and we don't learn anything about drilling for petroleum in the ocean.


Oh, about the job market, I don't know anything about aerospace so i can't talk, but about petroleum it has been booming where I live, thousands of jobs, new off shore platforms, new refining centers and the petrochemical industry is also growing at an alarming rate, especially since the discovery of the pre-salt layer. But I don't know about the USA.
One thing for sure, people will love to talk how petroleum is going to end just to find another big reserve.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Highway said:
wooooooooooooow, you guys take a lot of specialized and applied geology courses which is awesome, but i can't believe you don't have to take organic chem -- something that crude oil is.

i guess a lot of the ChE process and core classes are covered in the applied classes like reservoirs, etc.

probably so

btw sorry if i seemed hostile with my previous responses; i was in a bad mood

(finals stress nawmean?)
 
  • #12
nickadams said:
probably so

btw sorry if i seemed hostile with my previous responses; i was in a bad mood

(finals stress nawmean?)

lol, i had the same problem with someone last week. . . my 3 finals are tues/weds.
 
  • #13
FAlonso said:
I do. The reserves are surely one day going to get low causing slowed down production. As far last time I heard from some random mouth, petroleum sector is not experiencing any growth at all. It's just static. Aero industry depends on the orders from customers for e.g Boeing says thousands of jobs in America will be created from Emirates' order for 90 777-300ERs

Nope. Not in our life times. Nice try though.

Cuauhtemoc said:
At my university Petroleum engineering is focused on drilling and pumping the oil out, it's a lot more geology and mechanics, it doesn't focus at all on petroleum refining.
The refining part, cracking and all that is for us Chemical engineers.

The overlap is mainly in the part of mass and heat transfer and thermodynamics(but we see things like equilibrium with chemical reactions that I don't think they do), especially the property of fluids, equations of state, phase diagrams...
But Petroleum guys don't learn anything about chemistry and we don't learn anything about drilling for petroleum in the ocean.


Oh, about the job market, I don't know anything about aerospace so i can't talk, but about petroleum it has been booming where I live, thousands of jobs, new off shore platforms, new refining centers and the petrochemical industry is also growing at an alarming rate, especially since the discovery of the pre-salt layer. But I don't know about the USA.
One thing for sure, people will love to talk how petroleum is going to end just to find another big reserve.

Very well put. ChemEs deal with the refining and cracking along with chemical production. PEs deal with the engineering of getting the oil out of the ground.

PEs make a great deal of money, but the job is somewhat less glamorous with much of the bonusses earned with shifts on off-shore oil rigs. Especially earlier in your career.

ChemEs, IMO is one of the most flexible degrees (behind MechEs), and can work in most of the energy field.

Personally, if I were you, I would get a degree in Mechanical Engineering. You can work in the space industry (building rockets, etc.), or the oil industry (pumps, pipes, oil rigs, etc). Whatever you decide, do not allow $ to motivate you. You will only regret it later if it's something you don't enjoy.
 
  • #14
Yes, the early career of a PE is hard. In the company a friend of mine work, if you want to get well paid you need to work off shore and the routine go as follows:
3 weeks in the offshore rig, 1 week at home.
Oh nice you may think, 1 week of vacation per month...guess what, try to maintain a family staying 3 weeks far from them, your wife isn't going to like it.
Sure, if you are young and single it may be a nice adventure, and you will grow in the company so you won't need to do that anymore, but it will be strenuous in the beginning.
Another thing staying off shore is a daunting experience, many people get depressed after staying so much time far from the rest of the world. Accidents are also common.
But yes, you can make a nice amount of money, so much that some engineers can retire early after working for 10 years offshore(the main company in Brazil also gives bonus if you work in the offshore for too long, things like health insurance, they will finance your house for very low/zero interest rates...)

About the flexibility, ChemE are flexible in theory but most end up working in the petrochemical industry(if they keep being engineers). I've worked in the petrochemical industry making polymers and the fertilizer industry, with phosphates, personally.
Although the food and biotech industry has been hiring many chemical engineers.
Ethanol production is a big business in Brazil(and in the USA, the two greatest manufacturers) and they need tons of chem engineers.
If biofuels ever become dominant, chem engineers will be on heavy demand.

One cool thing about ChemEs is that almost no other engineers know much chemistry, while almost every engineer knows some mechanics.
But on the other hand MechE's are the MOST flexible as you said, they have a broader education and they are needed in almost any industry.

That's of course from the perspective of where I live but I'm sure some of it applies to the rest of the world.
 
  • #15
Cuauhtemoc said:
Yes, the early career of a PE is hard. In the company a friend of mine work, if you want to get well paid you need to work off shore and the routine go as follows:
3 weeks in the offshore rig, 1 week at home.
Oh nice you may think, 1 week of vacation per month...guess what, try to maintain a family staying 3 weeks far from them, your wife isn't going to like it.
Sure, if you are young and single it may be a nice adventure, and you will grow in the company so you won't need to do that anymore, but it will be strenuous in the beginning.
Another thing staying off shore is a daunting experience, many people get depressed after staying so much time far from the rest of the world. Accidents are also common.
But yes, you can make a nice amount of money, so much that some engineers can retire early after working for 10 years offshore(the main company in Brazil also gives bonus if you work in the offshore for too long, things like health insurance, they will finance your house for very low/zero interest rates...)

About the flexibility, ChemE are flexible in theory but most end up working in the petrochemical industry(if they keep being engineers). I've worked in the petrochemical industry making polymers and the fertilizer industry, with phosphates, personally.
Although the food and biotech industry has been hiring many chemical engineers.
Ethanol production is a big business in Brazil(and in the USA, the two greatest manufacturers) and they need tons of chem engineers.
If biofuels ever become dominant, chem engineers will be on heavy demand.

One cool thing about ChemEs is that almost no other engineers know much chemistry, while almost every engineer knows some mechanics.
But on the other hand MechE's are the MOST flexible as you said, they have a broader education and they are needed in almost any industry.

That's of course from the perspective of where I live but I'm sure some of it applies to the rest of the world.

Agreed. It's strange, who would've thought that two ChemEs would think alike :biggrin:?

One thing the OP may need want to look into is the difficulty of the degree. The ChemE program at my school (pretty well respected engineering school in CO) is almost overwhelmingly considered the hardest engineering degree, and the second hardest, with Physics being the worst (and most painful) in the school. It's just something to think about. I'm sure Aerospace may be hard, it depends, but ChemEs - as I'm finding out have a very painful course load, no matter where you go.
 
  • #16
Wellesley said:
Agreed. It's strange, who would've thought that two ChemEs would think alike :biggrin:?

One thing the OP may need want to look into is the difficulty of the degree. The ChemE program at my school (pretty well respected engineering school in CO) is almost overwhelmingly considered the hardest engineering degree, and the second hardest, with Physics being the worst (and most painful) in the school. It's just something to think about. I'm sure Aerospace may be hard, it depends, but ChemEs - as I'm finding out have a very painful course load, no matter where you go.

ChE is brutal by nature, no two ways about it . . .
 
  • #17
Highway said:
ChE is brutal by nature, no two ways about it . . .

I take it you're a ChemE...How far away from your degree are you?
 
  • #18
I was sort of in a similar position as you a couple years ago. Like you, I've always sort of wanted to work in aerospace or with NASA or something like that. I went into mechanical because I figured if it turns out aerospace wasn't my thing I could still get a job in another industry. Since then I've developed an interest in energy and am slowly carving a career path in that direction. I've had a couple of internships and kept up good grades, so I'm really not worried about finding a job after graduation.

So I guess my suggestion is look at MechE or ChemE because of the wide opportunities there. With PE I feel you might be a bit limited. With the other two you can still go for the relative stability of the energy sector if aerospace doesn't pan out.
 
  • #19
Wellesley said:
I take it you're a ChemE...How far away from your degree are you?

-2 years
 
  • #20
ehilge said:
With PE I feel you might be a bit limited.

Personally, that's the very reason why I didn't major in it.

Highway said:
-2 years
Ah so you haven't had the great stuff that most Juniors get to experience like ChemE thermo (finally done with it), Mass/Heat transfer (next semester for me), etc.
 
  • #21
Wellesley said:
Ah so you haven't had the great stuff that most Juniors get to experience like ChemE thermo (finally done with it), Mass/Heat transfer (next semester for me), etc.

You asked how many years I had left before I got my degree. A positive number would mean that I have "X" number of years left, where a negative number would mean that I graduated "X" number of years ago . . .

Also, we had thermo as a sophmore, and transport first semester junior year.
 
  • #22
Highway said:
You asked how many years I had left before I got my degree. A positive number would mean that I have "X" number of years left, where a negative number would mean that I graduated "X" number of years ago . . .

Also, we had thermo as a sophmore, and transport first semester junior year.

Hmmm...oh well. I thought that was a hypen like a bullet point. All I've got to say then is that you're lucky the torture is over with.
 
  • #23
Wellesley said:
Hmmm...oh well. I thought that was a hypen like a bullet point. All I've got to say then is that you're lucky the torture is over with.

I miss it and getting to hang out with my friends all day, every day. Literally the best time ever.
 
  • #24
Highway said:
I miss it and getting to hang out with my friends all day, every day. Literally the best time ever.

I feel ya. It seems like I just got to college, and I graduate in three semesters. It's crazy...
 
  • #25
I found the transport phenomena to be pretty interesting, the same with thermo but only I got a grasp of it, at first it was terrible.
 
  • #26
Cuauhtemoc said:
I found the transport phenomena to be pretty interesting, the same with thermo but only I got a grasp of it, at first it was terrible.

thermo wasn't bad, it was just boring. transport was easy as hell . . .
 
  • #27
Highway said:
thermo wasn't bad, it was just boring. transport was easy as hell . . .

Then you are either one smart ChemE...or your school wasn't interested in failing everyone like mine was. We had an "intro thermo" and then another semester called ChemE thermo. Absolutely the worst experience of my life.
 
  • #28
My intro thermo was called physical chemistry, it was physical chemistry with concepts like enthalpy and entropy...
Then we had quantum physical chemistry later
And then we had chemical engineering thermodynamics that followed the book by Smith and Van ness. As we had PC before our professor skipped the definitions of entropy and things like that.
The beginning was ok, we had to do things like calculating the flow in open systems to keep the temperature at some constant T...
The second part was harsh, we had to calculate liquid-gas equilibrium, flash towers...
That part was heavily computer based, we had to solve cubic equations of state like Peng-Robinson and it always led us to some gigantic non-linear system
We had like 4 hours to do a single test, with internet(and sometimes we needed to find some obscure coefficient in the literature...) and all that and it was still hard
But I kinda got the feel of it by the end of the semester and it started to be pretty fun(in my opinion haha)
It was the first course that I had to do something "real" instead of just solving some didactic exercise.

But in my opinion the hardest course was drafting(technical drawing) for some reason our university said we had to take a classical draft course,no CAD, we had to use T-square, pencil and paper...I was terrible at that.
It's funny because only the ChemE department asked for that, the MechE learned everything in autocad.
 
Last edited:
  • #29
Wellesley said:
Then you are either one smart ChemE...or your school wasn't interested in failing everyone like mine was. We had an "intro thermo" and then another semester called ChemE thermo. Absolutely the worst experience of my life.

i had one 7 credit thermo class + lab that met 5 days a week. average on the first midterm was a 29. it's the real deal. we derived van der waals, etc.
 
  • #30
Cuauhtemoc that sounds about right. I'm not sure how anyone could ever say thermo was fun, but I guess it's a matter of personal opinion...

Highway...7 credits? I'm not sure what to say to that.
 
  • #31
I agree Chem E is most likely the most difficult degree in terms of engineering (IMO, of course)--however, I must admit that this is most likely related to my disdain for chemistry (I have spoken to many fellow Mech E students and they dislike it as much as I do). I think much of it comes from the basic level of rote memorization involved with chemistry; oddly enough I am looking to make materials science, design and manufacturing my specialization in Mech E (which involves quite a bit of chemistry because of the materials)--go figure...
 
  • #32
I've worked in oil & gas and the petrochemical industry. That said, you couldn't pay me to major in PE. You'd be an idiot to do it simply because you think the industry isn't going anywhere. With that train of thought, you should have made the jump that the broadness of a ME degree keeps you available that industry as well as every other one.

Your best bet is to do what interests you, what you're good at, or what you CAN do that will provide you a living. I'm back at school for ME, when I have lots of chemical experience, because ME is what I enjoy. I don't want to limit myself even with a ChemE (I'm not saying ChemE is THAT limited, just saying that ME is much more broad), much less a PE.
 

1. What is the difference between Petroleum and Aerospace Engineering?

Petroleum engineering involves the exploration, extraction, and production of oil and gas resources. Aerospace engineering, on the other hand, focuses on the design, development, and testing of aircraft and spacecraft.

2. Which field has better job prospects?

Both Petroleum and Aerospace Engineering have good job prospects, but it ultimately depends on the current market demand and individual skills and qualifications.

3. Is one field more financially lucrative than the other?

Petroleum engineering typically has higher starting salaries, but aerospace engineering can also offer high-paying positions, especially in the defense and space industries.

4. Which field has more opportunities for research and innovation?

Both fields offer opportunities for research and innovation, but aerospace engineering may have more room for technological advancements due to the rapid development of new aircraft and spacecraft technologies.

5. Can I switch between the two fields in my career?

While it may be possible to switch between the two fields, it may require additional education and training. It is important to carefully consider your interests and career goals before making a decision.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
22
Views
928
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top