PF Member Photo Thread Archive

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4,578 replies · 993K views
Char. Limit said:
I have my own special axioms:

1. The women of PhysicsForums are good looking.
3. The women of PhysicsForums are smart.

Can't disagree.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jhae2.718 said:
Can't disagree.
Congratulations on going gold!

Ready to be banned tomorrow?
 
Evo said:
Congratulations on going gold!

Thanks!
Code:
OH HAI
VISIBLE "I haz a gold nao\n"
KTHXBYE

Evo said:
Ready to be banned tomorrow?

For ScienceTM!
 
Char. Limit said:
I have my own special axioms:

1. The women of PhysicsForums are good looking.
3. The women of PhysicsForums are smart.

Therefore, it can be proven that Evo is good looking and smart.

jhae2.718 said:
Can't disagree.

Q. What's the difference between *** kissing and brown nosing?

A. Depth perception!

:smile: Sorry, that joke arrived with me just before those two posts so just had to happen.
 
jhae2.718 said:
For ScienceTM!

Oh, taking a new side now are you?

Looks like it's just me looking out for aero engineering then.
 
Char. Limit said:
I have my own special axioms:

1. The women of PhysicsForums are good looking.
3. The women of PhysicsForums are smart.

Therefore, it can be proven that Evo is good looking and smart.

By the way, what's your second axiom?
 
jarednjames said:
Oh, taking a new side now are you?

Looks like it's just me looking out for aero engineering then.

Not a chance. I'm an aero all the way :)
 
jhae2.718 said:
By the way, what's your second axiom?

Axioms 2 and 4:

2. The men of PhysicsForums are good looking.
4. The men of PhysicsForums are smart.
 
3. The women of PhysicsForums are smart.
4. The men of PhysicsForums are smart.

Read the member comments on my profile and tell me if you still think those two apply (I know not if the poster was male or female, so it invalidates at least one of them).

You're looking at thedeester1
 
You mean gravity can't prevent light from moving? :biggrin:
 
jhae2.718 said:
You mean gravity can't prevent light from moving? :biggrin:

Yeah, that's the general area.

Liking the new signature!
 
Char. Limit said:
I have my own special axioms:

1. The women of PhysicsForums are good looking.
3. The women of PhysicsForums are smart.

Therefore, it can be proven that Evo is good looking and smart.
The women of PF are above average. :biggrin:
 
What's Axiom 0?
 
Oh, that's easy.

0: The following axioms are true.
 
or -1, 5, -2, 6 ... ? :-p
 
Amazon said:
That is a picture of me, and most of the photographers I've worked with put a small water mark in the corner. If you want some more proof I can post up some other pictures, heck I'm even on the home page of a website if you want the link.

If you look as good on other pictures I guess I will voice request of the male part of PF saying: yes, post the link.

You my friend have been very wrong with all of the things you've said.

I don't have problems with being wrong. Actually I am wrong at least once a day. But I am glad you called me your friend :wink: Just don't tell my wife.

did you think that good looking girls don't have brains?

You are jumping to sexist conclusions In my experience someone posting copyrighted picture as his own is most likely a random spammer. It has nothing to do with owing a brain, it is just a spamdexing technique.
 
[noparse]http://www.shessobeautiful.ca/index2.php?v=v1[/noparse]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Amazon said:
Link Omitted

Really? Is that actually proving anything? (Well it proves you've got a link to your site for Google I suppose.)
 
jarednjames said:
Really? Is that actually proving anything? (Well it proves you've got a link to your site for Google I suppose.)

gah.. what will it take for you guys to believe it's me?
 
Amazon said:
gah.. what will it take for you guys to believe it's me?

Don't take it personally, it's for the best on the internet. I think everyone understands why.
 
Amazon said:
gah.. what will it take for you guys to believe it's me?

I think you might be so beautiful that people wouldn't believe it unless you meet them in person:biggrin:
I thought she is beautiful and then some devils pointed out many things lacking in her face ... I am no longer sure about what's beautiful and what's not.
517FtnrJBeL._SL500_AA280_.jpg
 
Last edited:
rootX said:
I thought she is beautiful and then some devils pointed out many things lacking in her face ... I am no longer sure about what's beautiful and what's not.

It truly is in the eye of the beholder.

Amazon said:
gah.. what will it take for you guys to believe it's me?

A self portrait of you, taken by yourself with a piece of paper showing the handwritten time and date.

Along with high resolution pictures of your finger prints, ID, SIN number, and bank information.
 
KrisOhn said:
It truly is in the eye of the beholder.



A self portrait of you, taken by yourself with a piece of paper showing the handwritten time and date.

Along with high resolution pictures of your finger prints, ID, SIN number, and bank information.

I always thought beauty was in the eye of the beer holder :P

I'll get right on that, I'll make sure to use a fat sharpie to write my SIN number and banking info, so you guys can see it well and make sure it's me :P
 
rootX said:
I think you might be so beautiful that people wouldn't believe it unless you...

I was going to say:
unless you post to a section of PF that actually scores you "posting points."
 
physics girl phd said:
I was going to say:
unless you post to a section of PF that actually scores you "posting points."

ohhhh so not every section counts towards posts. I was wondering why it was still at zero. Well I'll try and find the thread I used for help on a calculus problem and post up there.
 
physics girl phd said:
I was going to say:
unless you post to a section of PF that actually scores you "posting points."

Out of curiosity, which sections don't count towards overall post count?
 
jhae2.718 said:
Out of curiosity, which sections don't count towards overall post count?

General discussion in general.
 
Amazon said:
gah.. what will it take for you guys to believe it's me?

As far as I can tell there is no picture of yours on the site you linked to. So far I am with jnj on this one (or rather - he is with me :devil:).
 
Borek said:
As far as I can tell there is no picture of yours on the site you linked to. So far I am with jnj on this one (or rather - he is with me :devil:).
Amazon, your join date of April 1st doesn't help much either...