Phase velocity in oblique Angle propagation (Plane wave)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the phase velocity of oblique angle propagation in plane waves, referencing Balanis' "Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics." The key equations derived include the electric field expression and the phase velocities in both the x and z directions. It is established that while the x phase velocity is mathematically significant, it is often overlooked in favor of the z phase velocity due to its derivation being similar. Additionally, the resultant phase velocity differs from the speed of light due to the geometric relationship between the velocities in the x and z directions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Familiarity with complex exponential functions in signal representation
  • Knowledge of phase velocity and its mathematical derivation
  • Basic concepts of trigonometry as applied to wave mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of phase velocity in electromagnetic waves using Balanis' "Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics"
  • Explore the implications of phase velocity in different media and angles of propagation
  • Learn about the relationship between phase velocity and group velocity in wave mechanics
  • Investigate the applications of phase velocity in antenna design and signal processing
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for electrical engineers, physicists, and students studying electromagnetic theory, particularly those interested in wave propagation and its applications in technology.

baby_1
Messages
159
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
Maxwell equation
Relevant Equations
V=xt
Hello,
Regarding the wave oblique angle propagation and based on Balanis "Advanced engineering Electromagnetic" book on page 136 ( it has been attached) I need to know why the phase velocity in x direction is not important to keep in step with a constant phase plane( Just equation 4-23).
question.JPG
I derived the electric filed:
\vec{E}=E_{x}(z)e^{-j\beta (xSin(\theta )+zCos(\theta ))}
For calculating the phase velocity we need to obtain the time-domain form:
\vec{E(t)}=Re\{E_{x}(z)e^{-j\beta (xSin(\theta )+zCos(\theta ))}e^{jwt}\}=E_{x}(z)Cos(\omega t-\beta (xSin(\theta )+zCos(\theta ))
Calculating the Z- phase velocity (X=0):
\frac{d}{dt}(\omega t-\beta zCos(\theta ))=0=>\omega -\beta \frac{dz}{dt}Cos(\theta )=0=>v_{z}=\frac{\omega}{\beta Cos(\theta )}
which is the same as the book. However,

1)First: I need to know why the x velocity (on x-axis) is not important.
x phase velocity:(z=0)
\frac{d}{dt}(\omega t-\beta xSin(\theta ))=0=>\omega -\beta \frac{dx}{dt}Sin(\theta )=0=>v_{x}=\frac{\omega}{\beta Sin(\theta )}
2)Second: Why the resultant phase velocity is not the same as the light velocity(v_{c}=\frac{\omega}{\beta})
\sqrt{v_{z}^2+v_{x}^2}=\sqrt{({\frac{\omega}{\beta Cos(\theta )})}^2+({\frac{\omega}{\beta Sin(\theta )})}^2}=(\frac{\omega}{\beta Sin(2*\theta )})
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
baby_1 said:
1)First: I need to know why the x velocity (on x-axis) is not important.
The "x velocity" is just as important as the "z velocity". I guess that the textbook just decided not to mention the x velocity since it can be found in a similar manner to the z velocity. Below, I denote these velocities as ##u_x## and ##u_z##.

baby_1 said:
2)Second: Why the resultant phase velocity is not the same as the light velocity(v_{c}=\frac{\omega}{\beta})
\sqrt{v_{z}^2+v_{x}^2}=\sqrt{({\frac{\omega}{\beta Cos(\theta )})}^2+({\frac{\omega}{\beta Sin(\theta )})}^2}=(\frac{\omega}{\beta Sin(2*\theta )})
Imagine a stick moving with translational velocity ##\vec v## as shown below. The stick is the black line and ##\vec v## is perpendicular to the stick. The z and x components of ##\vec v## would be ##v_z= v \cos \theta## and ##v_x = v \sin \theta##.
1627072157553.png


The points of intersection of the stick with the z and x axes are shown in green. The speed at which the intersection with the z-axis moves along the z-axis is ##u_z = \frac{v}{\cos \theta}##. Similarly, for the speed of the intersection along the x-axis, ##u_x = \frac{v}{\sin \theta}##.

##u_z## and ##u_x## are not the z and x components of the velocity of some single point. In particular, they are not the z and x components of the velocity of some point on the stick. So, we do not expect ##v = \sqrt {u_z^2+u_x^2}##.

The textbook uses the notation ##v_{pz}## and ##v_{px}## for ##u_z## and ##u_x##. These should not be confused with the ##z## and ##x## components of the vector ##\vec v##: ##v_z## and ##v_x##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2, baby_1 and hutchphd
I see the Like is nothing to thank you. I really appreciate your explanations and the time you spent to draw the shape and explain more and more.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
You are welcome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
932
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K