Phd in Astrophysics after Masters in Comp Science

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and challenges of transitioning from a Master's in Computer Science to pursuing a PhD in Astrophysics or Astronomy. Participants explore the necessary academic background, the competitiveness of institutions like Caltech, and the personal motivations for entering the field of astrophysics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the difficulty for a computer science graduate to pursue a PhD in Astrophysics, suggesting that it depends on their previous background.
  • Another participant asserts that without an undergraduate degree in physics, it may not be possible to pursue a PhD in Physics/Astrophysics.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the importance of focusing on developing one idea in physics rather than generating numerous theories, suggesting that productivity in the field requires a different approach to thinking.
  • Several participants discuss the rigorous undergraduate physics coursework required before applying to graduate programs, including various physics and mathematics subjects.
  • Concerns are raised about the competitiveness of getting into prestigious programs like Caltech, with one participant noting that it is quite hard but there are other options available.
  • Another participant expresses determination to pursue a PhD regardless of the challenges, indicating a strong personal motivation to contribute to the field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of transitioning from computer science to astrophysics, particularly regarding the necessity of an undergraduate physics background. There is no consensus on the best path forward, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific requirements and challenges involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various prerequisites for graduate study in astrophysics, including specific physics courses and research experience, but do not reach a definitive agreement on the implications of lacking an undergraduate physics degree.

HEAT_RS
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I Have done my Masters in Computer Science from a top 20 universities of USA but I am not satisfied my this, I always wanted to become Astronomical Scientist.

I Have read rules & guidelines, didnt answer my queries.

Q1. How to tough is fit or a computer science graduate to do phd in Astrophysics/Astronomy ?

Q2. How tough is it to get in CALTECH?

Q3. I can't sleep at night thinking about Universe, I have 100+ new theories related to universe to prove something to world, are u all guys like me or I m a unique stupid?

- Heat RS
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's your undergraduate degree in? Have you studied any physics?
 
I did my bachelors of engineering in Information Technology from India.
 
So you have done no undergraduate physics? In which case it will not be possible to do a PhD in Physics/Astrophysics.
 
cristo said:
So you have done no undergraduate physics? In which case it will not be possible to do a PhD in Physics/Astrophysics.

It will not be possible ? ROFL.

I will do it no matter what I have to learn & for how long.



Thank you so much for prompt replies.
 
HEAT_RS said:
Q1. How to tough is fit or a computer science graduate to do phd in Astrophysics/Astronomy ?

Depends on previous background.

Q2. How tough is it to get in CALTECH?

Quite hard, but there are dozens of other schools.

Q3. I can't sleep at night thinking about Universe, I have 100+ new theories related to universe to prove something to world, are u all guys like me or I m a unique stupid?

You aren't going to be very productive at physics.

The hard part in physics is not to think of new ideas. Thinking of new ideas is easy. The really tough part is to take *one* idea and then develop it, and then let other people worry about the other 99 ideas you have. If you are always thinking of new ideas, you'll never get anything done. You need to worry about focusing on *one* (o.k. maybe *two*) ideas and develop them.

The other hard part is to take the precious idea that you have and then destroy it. Once you have a new idea, your job is to take the idea and try to destroy it with a sledgehammer. If you can't destroy it then you get other people to try to destroy it.

You need some intelligence to do physics, but intelligence isn't the most important quality.
 
Thanks appreciate the advice .
 
First, you need to complete the undergraduate physics classes - that includes intro physics I and II (calculus-based), modern physics, classical mechanics, electromagnetism, thermodynamics & statistical mechanics, quantum mechanics, 2 semesters of math for physicists, linear algebra, and differential equations at the very least. Then you need to do well on the Physics GRE and start applying to grad schools. It would help a lot if you could get some research experience in the field. Then you'd need to complete the masters coursework in physics/astrophysics before proceeding to the PhD - right now, you'd have no shot at all at passing a qualifying exam. CalTech is very difficult to get into; your chances are not good.
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K