Photoelectric effect and Compton scattering

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving the photoelectric effect and Compton scattering, specifically the ejection of an electron from a hydrogen atom by a photon with 13600 eV energy. Participants clarify that the electron is ejected due to the photoelectric effect, as indicated by the problem statement, but express confusion over the mention of a recoiling photon, which is not typical in the photoelectric effect. The kinetic energy of the ejected electron is derived from the incoming photon’s energy minus the work function of 13.6 eV. Participants suggest treating the problem as a conservation of energy and momentum scenario to resolve the confusion. Ultimately, it is concluded that there should be no recoil photon in this context, as the photon transfers all its energy to the electron.
AllRelative
Messages
42
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A photon with of 13600eV energy interacts with a hydrogen atom at rest and ejects the electron (photoelectrically) in the direction in which the photon was travelling. If 13.6 eV is required to eject the electron, find the speed of the photoelectron and the momentum and energy of the recoiling photon.

Homework Equations


Energy of a Photo: E = h*f

Photo electric effect: KEmax = hf - phi

Momentum for a photon: p = h / lamda

Compton Effect: lamda ' - lamda = h / Me*c (1 - Cos theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


Now I'm confused. In class we learned about the photoelectric effect and the Compton Scattering separately. I understand and can do problems about both concepts. What I don't understand here is the ejection of the electron.

Is the electron ejected due to the photoelectric effect or due to a collision with the photon?

I know that Phi is 13.6eV. This energy will be lost due to pulling the electron out of the atom.

Is the Kinetic energy of the ejected electron coming from the collision with the photon.Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know that Phi is 13.6eV. This energy will be lost due to pulling the electron out of the atom.
Is the Kinetic energy of the ejected electron coming from the collision with the photon.
... it is not useful to think of the interaction as a "collision".
It is just an interaction ... electrons and photons are not like little balls that have surfaces that can strike each other.

Is the electron ejected due to the photoelectric effect or due to a collision with the photon?
... the problem statement specifies "photoelectrically", but also says there is a recoil photon. In the photoelectric effect the incoming photon is completely absorbed by the electron so there is no "recoil photon" so I see your confusion.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mod2.html

I think you need to get a clarification from the person who wrote the problem.

In the absence of a clarification, I'd combine the information ... treat it as a conservation of energy and momentum problem without worrying about what name to use.
You have some initial state, something happens, and you get some final state. You need to relate energy to momentum and the initial state to the final state.
 
Thanks for the reply! Sadly this question is for an assignment I have to hand in tomorrow and I won't be able to get clarification on the problem.

I understand that the photon is absorbed. The question just confused me. The projected electron takes the energy of the incoming photon minus the work function of 13.6 eV. This will give it its Kinetic Energy. I can therefore find it's velocity, momentum and total energy.
 
Thanks for the reply! Sadly this question is for an assignment I have to hand in tomorrow and I won't be able to get clarification on the problem.
In the absence of a clarification, I'd combine the information ... treat it as a conservation of energy and momentum problem without worrying about what name to use.
You have some initial state, something happens, and you get some final state. You need to relate energy to momentum and the initial state to the final state.

The projected electron takes the energy of the incoming photon minus the work function of 13.6 eV. This will give it its Kinetic Energy. I can therefore find it's velocity, momentum and total energy.
... you could take it like that, but then: how will you answer the second part of the problem - the bit about the recoil photon?
 
Simon Bridge said:
In the absence of a clarification, I'd combine the information ... treat it as a conservation of energy and momentum problem without worrying about what name to use.
You have some initial state, something happens, and you get some final state. You need to relate energy to momentum and the initial state to the final state.

... you could take it like that, but then: how will you answer the second part of the problem - the bit about the recoil photon?

I just read the section on the photoelectric effect in my book and it says clearly that the photon transfers all its energy to the electron. Therefore there is no photon to speak of...
 
So your answer to the second question is that there is no recoil photon?
Fair enough - let me know how it went.
 
  • Like
Likes AllRelative
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K