Photons in amorphous glass slow because?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the behavior of photons in amorphous glass and the reasons behind their reduced effective speed. Participants explore the role of phonons, dielectric polarization, and interactions between photons and phonons in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that in solids, the interaction between phonons and photons leads to a lower effective speed of light, but questions this in the context of amorphous glass, claiming it has no phonons.
  • Another participant counters that phonons do exist in amorphous glass, suggesting that the original claim is incorrect.
  • Further clarification is sought regarding the nature of phonons in amorphous materials, with a focus on localized dispersion relations and their implications.
  • One participant discusses the concept of dielectric polarization in classical terms and phonons in quantum terms, emphasizing that both contribute to slower light propagation.
  • There is mention of interactions between photons and phonons, including specific examples from research on ion trapping and atomic transitions.
  • A reference to Kittel's work on thermal conductivity in glasses is provided, indicating that phonons are discussed in the context of both glasses and liquids.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the existence of phonons in amorphous glass, with some asserting their presence and others questioning this. The discussion remains unresolved as differing viewpoints are presented without consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the interactions at play and express confusion regarding the mechanisms involved, indicating that there may be limitations in understanding the microscopic versus macroscopic behaviors of light in amorphous materials.

aimforclarity
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
In solids it is the interaciton b/w the phonons and photons that give a lower effective speed. not absorption & re-emmision. (see ZapperZ's post: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=511177 )

but in amorphous glass there are no phonons. So why does light 'slow down'?

:rolleyes:
AimForClarity
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
The phonons are there.
 
Antiphon said:
The phonons are there.

what do you mean? they are localized dispersion relations for different zones, corresponding to some small order?
 
I mean you stated that amourphous glass has no phonons. This is incorrect.

In classical terms you have dielectric polarization. In quantum terms you have phonons. Either way you slice it, you have slower light propagation.
 
Antiphon said:
I mean you stated that amourphous glass has no phonons. This is incorrect.

In classical terms you have dielectric polarization. In quantum terms you have phonons. Either way you slice it, you have slower light propagation.

well there is some interaction b/w the photon and the phonons, like in ion trapping, where you get dressed states of the phonon ladder and the qubit (some transition in say Yb+ (Monroe research)) which atomic transition (qubit) the light field can interact with.
on the other hand this is some microscopic mechanism and i relaize now not the one we see in bulk, since we can almost treat that classically as the e&m field driving atoms physically rather than by some inner atomic transition.

anyway, i remain confused

does Kittel or Ashcroft & Mermin talk about this somewhere?
 
Kittel has a paper where he discuss thermal conduction in glasses in terms of phonons.
It is quite old: Interpretation of the Thermal Conductivity of Glasses, Physical Review, vol 75 no 6 page 972 (1949).
He mentions phonons in liquids as well.
There are more recent papers treating amorphous materials (especially amorphous metals) and using the concept of phonon.
Vibrations of the lattice exist no matter if the lattice is periodic or not.
 
thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
843
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K