Phsyics Kinematics: cannonball shot straight up

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the kinematics of a cannonball shot straight up, focusing on calculations involving time, distance, and angles. The user initially calculated the time of flight as 20 seconds and the distance as 60 meters, leading to confusion about a significant discrepancy of 960 meters from the target. It was clarified that the angle of projection is crucial, with a suggested angle of 45 degrees for optimal distance. The conversation also touched on the lack of horizontal acceleration, emphasizing that gravity only influences vertical motion. Ultimately, the correct answer for the distance traveled was identified as 31.2 meters, highlighting the importance of accurate calculations in physics problems.
okgo
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
http://www.screencast.com/users/trinhn812/folders/Jing/media/5c3b51ea-aed8-4321-964c-126b49a3c1dc

F/m = 0.3m/s^2
distance in x direction= 1/2(a)(T^2)

By placing v(y) =0 and v(initial)=100 I found the time to be 20 sec.
But my answer is 60m. So 1020-60=960m

Wouldn't the ball misss the target by more than 960 meters? Why are the options ranging from 15-60. Perhaps I'm missing the point here. The acutal answer is 31.2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
okgo said:
http://www.screencast.com/users/trinhn812/folders/Jing/media/5c3b51ea-aed8-4321-964c-126b49a3c1dc

F/m = 0.3m/s^2
distance in x direction= 1/2(a)(T^2)

By placing v(y) =0 and v(initial)=100 I found the time to be 20 sec.
But my answer is 60m. So 1020-60=960m

Wouldn't the ball misss the target by more than 960 meters? Why are the options ranging from 15-60. Perhaps I'm missing the point here. The acutal answer is 31.2

here is my math for it.

v_{y}=v\sin\theta
v_{x}=v\cos\theta

t=\frac{v\sin\theta}{g}
to get the total time in the air multiply by two, becuase that time is only half way.
x=v\cos\left(\theta\right) t
plug in t
x=\frac{2v^2\sin\theta \cos\theta}{g}

that should get you the distance traveled... i think but look over my math.
 
Oh. I'm having trouble with the angle though. Not sure what it would be.
 
and isn't there acceleartion in the x direction too?
 
okgo said:
Oh. I'm having trouble with the angle though. Not sure what it would be.

okgo said:
and isn't there acceleartion in the x direction too?

From what i saw in the problem there were not any more forces than just gravity... and gravity only works in the y direction. your angle is the one given in the problem, 45.
 
Oh I was talking about question 23. Hehe I already solved for question 22. Oh well. My exam is in 20 min. Dumdumdum. So it's okay. Thanks for the help though
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top