Physical explanation for camera DOF (depth of field)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physical explanation of depth of field (DOF) in photography, focusing on how aperture size affects the sharpness and range of focus in images. Participants explore the underlying principles of optics and the behavior of light as it interacts with camera lenses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that a larger diaphragm results in a smaller range of sharp focus in photographs, linking this to the need for a shorter shutter opening to avoid overexposure.
  • Another participant expresses a desire for a simpler explanation of the physical effects of depth of field, indicating that existing resources are too technical.
  • A participant describes the concept of perfect focus and how moving an object affects the image on the sensor, introducing the idea of a blur circle and its relation to acceptable focus ranges.
  • It is proposed that the distance between maximum and minimum object distances defines the depth of field, with a smaller lens aperture leading to a smaller blur circle and thus a greater depth of field.
  • One participant contrasts the theoretical extremes of depth of field, suggesting that while lenses can achieve zero DOF, pinhole cameras can achieve infinite DOF, and discusses practical implications for image aesthetics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present various viewpoints on the relationship between aperture size and depth of field, with some agreeing on the principles of blur circles and focus ranges, while others highlight differing interpretations of the effects of lens design and aperture on image quality. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the nuances of depth of field.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference diagrams to illustrate concepts, but there may be limitations in the assumptions made about the ideal behavior of lenses and the practical implications of different camera designs.

Kirl
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_field" stands for the range that is sharp on a photograph.

The bigger the diafragma (camera opening) the smaller the range that will be sharp on the picture. A bigger diafragma also means a shorter shutter opening (so the picture doesn't become too bright).

I'm interested in the physical explanation of this effect. The explanation on wikipedia is much too technical for me to follow.

I am not a physicist I just enjoy reading about it, so please explain as if to someone who has no idea about the field, thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Kirl said:
"[URL
I'm interested in the physical explanation of this effect. The explanation on wikipedia is much too technical for me to follow.
.
Use the how things work explanation
http://www.howstuffworks.com/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
See the attached diagrams.

For perfect focus (top diagram), the image has to be located exactly at the sensor plane. Only one object distance can produce this, for a given focal length and lens-sensor distance.

When we move the object to the left (middle diagram), the image also moves to the left, in front of the sensor, and we get a circular spot on the sensor, which is often called the blur circle. In practice, we can tolerate a blur circle up to a certain maximum size, which corresponds to a certain maximum object distance.

When we move the object to the right (bottom diagram), the image also moves to the right, behind the sensor, and again we get a blur circle. The maximum tolerable blur circle size corresponds to a certain minimum object distance.

The distance between these maximum and minimum object distances is the depth of field.

If we make the lens effectively smaller by putting a diaphragm in front of it, but keep the object and image distances the same, we get a smaller blur circle. To get the same maximum blur circle size as before, we need to increase the maximum object distance and decrease the minimum object distance, which increases the depth of field.
 

Attachments

  • dof.gif
    dof.gif
    15.9 KB · Views: 720
In theory, every lens has zero depth of field (focusing light into an image from only one distance exactly) and a pinhole-camera has infinite depth of field (rays from any distance produce an image). In practice, there is always a continuum (ie. you can close the aperture slightly to get a slightly more pinhole-camera-ish result).

Incidentally, this is also why big heavy expensive cameras tend to produce photos with aesthetically blurred backdrops, whereas in a small digicam's photo your eye is distracted by the detail in every item of litter in the background.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K