Physical Significance of Numbers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physical significance of velocity in free fall, specifically analyzing a ball falling under a constant acceleration of 10 m/s². Using the formula v[final]² = 2ad + v[initial]², participants derive that the final velocity can be +10 m/s or -10 m/s. The conversation highlights the importance of vector components in physics, emphasizing that the negative solution corresponds to downward motion, while the positive solution represents a hypothetical scenario. The discussion concludes with a clarification of the physical reality of both solutions in the context of motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations, specifically v = u + at
  • Knowledge of vector components in physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of acceleration due to gravity
  • Basic mathematical skills for solving quadratic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of vector direction in kinematics
  • Explore the concept of free fall and its applications in real-world scenarios
  • Learn about the role of initial conditions in motion analysis
  • Investigate the differences between scalar and vector quantities in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of motion and acceleration in classical mechanics.

gamemania1986
Consider this case: A ball is allowed to fall freely with a constant acceleration of 10 m/s^2. What will its speed be after traveling a distance of 10 m?

We get that:
v[initial] = 0 m/s
d = -5 m (downward direction is taken as negative)
a = -10 m/s^2

To find v[final], we will use the formula d = (v[final]^2-v[initial]^2) / (2a)

Rearranging, we will get:

v[final]^2 = 2ad + v[initial]^2

By plugging the numbers, we will get:

v[final]^2 = 100 m^2/s^2

By mathematics, there are 2 solutions to this problem, that is v[initial][1] = +10 m/s and v[initial][2] = -10 m/s. I can only think of the situation where the ball has a downward velocity. Is the other answer (the one with +10 m/s velocity) possible/does it has a physical reality? If so, can anyone explain the situation? Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think to obtain your first formula, the identity
vf - vi = a*t
is used.
Next, you divide by a to get t, and plug that into d = a/2 * t^2.

But strictly speaking, d, v, and a are vectors.
So you are in fact not allowed to divide by a.

You could work around this by saying you just talk about one component (the z-component) of each vector. But this implies that (vf-vi) has the same sign as a (i.e., minus).

Of course, this is still true in the answer.
 
Hi,
u consider a stationary ball 'b' directly below the falling ball and calculate the velocity of 'b' in + with respect to free falling ball.

Else, if free fall is not crucial, vertical take off of a rocket (containing the ball) with acceleration 10 m/s^2. v = u + at = final velocity of both rocket & ball.
 
Last edited:
By mathematics, there are 2 solutions to this problem, that is v[initial][1] = +10 m/s and v[initial][2] = -10 m/s. I can only think of the situation where the ball has a downward velocity. Is the other answer (the one with +10 m/s velocity) possible/does it has a physical reality? If so, can anyone explain the situation? Thanks a lot!


The -10 m/s velocity occurs when you trace the evolution of the system going forward in time. Consider the trajectory of the ball before it had the 0 m/s velocity.

Hurkyl
 
Aaaah... I got it! Thanks a lot Hurkyl!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K