Physics and mathematical hyperoperations above exponentiation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the sufficiency of exponentiation in modeling physical processes, with a strong assertion that no significant physics requires tetration or higher-order hyperoperations. The conversation highlights the role of group structures, particularly Lie groups, in physics, emphasizing the exponential map's utility in translating parameters to group actions. The speaker expresses skepticism about the necessity of non-associative operations like tetration, suggesting that current paradigms in physics are fundamentally associative and do not require such complexity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponentiation and its mathematical properties
  • Familiarity with group theory, specifically Lie groups
  • Knowledge of the exponential map and its applications in physics
  • Basic concepts of associativity in mathematical operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the applications of Lie groups in modern physics
  • Explore the role of the exponential map in dynamical systems
  • Investigate the implications of non-associative algebra in theoretical physics
  • Study combinatorial applications of hyperoperations in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and students interested in the intersection of group theory and physical modeling, particularly those exploring the limits of mathematical operations in theoretical frameworks.

Jenab2
Messages
85
Reaction score
22
TL;DR
The question is whether any physical process requires tetration, pentation, or any hyperoperation above the level of exponentiation, in order to be modeled.
I personally don't know of any physical process that can't be modeled without need for tetration or higher order hyperoperations. In my own experience, exponentiation suffices. Does anyone else know about a physical process that can't be well-modeled unless tetration is used in the math?
 
  • Like
Likes andrewkirk
Physics news on Phys.org
I seriously doubt any significant physics will require anything beyond exponentiation. More and more the language of physics has centered around group structure, specifically the Lie groups representing symmetries or dynamical transformations. These utilize the exponential map to translate the parameters (time Lie algebra generators) to the group actions.

Periodic behavior and exponential growth/decay can both be seen to arise within this group context.

This emerges, I believe, because we work in a paradigm of actions on systems which is fundamentally associative (it is built into the semantics of composition of actions). As such they can be iterated in a group structure and that iteration is parameterized by an exponential map. Iterating the actual power operation is horribly non-associative (a^b)^c != a^(b^c) and so doesn't reflect the kind of thing we iterate as an action.

While I've played with some possible application of non-associative product structures in theoretical mathematics (exotic particle statistics) it would be a stretch to find an application of e.g. tetration there. Maybe not impossible though, some wild combinatorics application?
 
In sci-fi when an author is talking about space travellers or describing the movement of galaxies they will say something like “movement in space only means anything in relation to another object”. Examples of this would be, a space ship moving away from earth at 100 km/s, or 2 galaxies moving towards each other at one light year per century. I think it would make it easier to describe movement in space if we had three axis that we all agree on and we used 0 km/s relative to the speed of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
220
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
6K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
560