Physics Exam Revision Help - Exam in 5 hours

In summary: If the weight of the object is 200N (20x10), wouldn't the force required to lift it be equal and opposite?It would be 200N in the opposite direction.
  • #1
ichigo
9
0
Your help would be greatly appreciated

1. If an object is dropped from a cliff, how many seconds will it take to have a speed of 80m/s?

would gravity be taken into account? This question seems weird because you usually get given 2 variables to get the third, unless I am missing something...2. What force is required to lift a 20kg weight off the ground?

gravity is 10 (for our exam, 10 is acceptable on earth), 20kg mass. F=ma, but there is no acceleration given, so I don't know what to do3. A man exerts a 300N upwards force on a 20kg weight that was resting on the ground

a) draw a free body diagram of the forces on the weight
I don't know what a free body diagram is

b) What is the net force on the weight?

I don't know how to calculate net force

Sorry if these sound like easy questions, but this is my first year of studying physics, and I don't get it 100%
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ichigo said:
Your help would be greatly appreciated

1. If an object is dropped from a cliff, how many seconds will it take to have a speed of 80m/s?

would gravity be taken into account? This question seems weird because you usually get given 2 variables to get the third, unless I am missing something...

(I assume that) The question assumes that the gravitational acceleration is [itex]9.8\frac{m}{s^2}[/itex] (or [itex]10\frac{m}{s^2}[/itex]) so you actually have 3 pieces of information (final velocity = [itex]80\frac{m}{s}[/itex] ... initial velocity = [itex]0\frac{m}{s}[/itex] ... acceleration = [itex]9.8\frac{m}{s^2}[/itex] or [itex]10\frac{m}{s^2}[/itex]) and you want to figure out the fourth piece of information (time)
Do you know how to do this?

ichigo said:
2. What force is required to lift a 20kg weight off the ground?

gravity is 10 (for our exam, 10 is acceptable on earth), 20kg mass. F=ma, but there is no acceleration given, so I don't know what to do
Let's restate the problem:
What force is required to hold a 20kg weight above the ground?

Now can you solve the problem?

ichigo said:
3. A man exerts a 300N upwards force on a 20kg weight that was resting on the ground

a) draw a free body diagram of the forces on the weight
I don't know what a free body diagram is

b) What is the net force on the weight?

I don't know how to calculate net force
Net force depends on the situation (It's the sum of all the forces.)

In this situation what forces act on the weight?
Well I can tell you one force is 300N Upwards (remember! Direction IS IMPORTANT) because that's what the problem says! :)

What other force(s) would be acting on the object? (And in what direction?)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #3
Would the answer to question 2 be 200N?

If the weight of the object is 200N (20x10), wouldn't the force required to lift it be equal and opposite?


Also, for question 3, would the other force be the weight of the object? So 200N, + 300N, is the net force 500N?
 
  • #4
ichigo said:
Would the answer to question 2 be 200N?

If the weight of the object is 200N (20x10), wouldn't the force required to lift it be equal and opposite?
Correct. Equal in magnitude, opposite in direction.

ichigo said:
Also, for question 3, would the other force be the weight of the object? So 200N, + 300N, is the net force 500N?

But remember what I said about how direction is important?

You're correct that the other force would be 200N from gravity, but what direction would that force be in?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #5
would the answer to question 1 be 8s?

if t=Δv/acceleration, =80-0/10= 8 seconds?
 
  • #6
for question 3: it has a downward force of 200N. The net force would still be 500N right?
 
  • #7
ichigo said:
would the answer to question 1 be 8s?

if t=Δv/acceleration, =80-0/10= 8 seconds?

Correct.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #8
Okay, my final question:

How do you calculate the distance and displacement on a distance-time graph?

I know that for a velocity-time graph, distance is the area underneath the line, and displacement is the area underneath the line, but taking the negative into account

Is it the same for a distance time graph?
 
  • #9
ichigo said:
for question 3: it has a downward force of 200N. The net force would still be 500N right?

For a lot of problems you have to choose "the positive direction"

Think of a numberline, the positive direction would be to the right, and so moving to the left would be negative.


In this situation, either up or down would be the positive direction. (Because the problem has nothing to do with left/right, only up/down)


Since the forces are in opposite directions (one up, one down) they will have opposite values (one positive, one negative)


I don't know if I explained this very well but hopefully you understand.

So instead of the answer being 300N+200N, what would it be?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #10
ichigo said:
Okay, my final question:

How do you calculate the distance and displacement on a distance-time graph?

I know that for a velocity-time graph, distance is the area underneath the line, and displacement is the area underneath the line, but taking the negative into account

Is it the same for a distance time graph?

If you have distance graphed along time (a "distance-time graph") then the displacement will just be the change in the height of the graph.

So say you have the distance as a function of time d(t) (which can be graphed to create a distance-time graph) the displacement from [itex]t_1[/itex] to [itex]t_2[/itex] will be [itex]d(t_2)-d(t_1[/itex])If you have velocity as a function of time, the displacement from [itex]t_1[/itex] to [itex]t_2[/itex] will be the area under the graph from [itex]t_1[/itex] to [itex]t_2[/itex]

But for the distance as a function of time, you just look at the height of the graph, not the area under it.
(I don't know if I explained that clearly, but ask questions if you need to)
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #11
does question 3 mean the resultant force? So its 300-200 =100N?
 
  • #12
ichigo said:
does question 3 mean the resultant force? So its 300-200 =100N?

Yes, the Net force is just the resultant force of ALL the forces acting on something.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #13
I understand everything except for (I'm guessing) the easiest part. How is the distance calculated on a distance time graph? If the line is curving up and down, how would you be able to tell?
 
  • #14
ichigo said:
I understand everything except for (I'm guessing) the easiest part. How is the distance calculated on a distance time graph? If the line is curving up and down, how would you be able to tell?

It's an easy concept (the problem is just that it's hard to explain easy concepts)

Basically the distance-time graph is a graph of the displacement over time. So the value (or height) of the graph is the value of the displacement (EXCEPT you also have to subtract the original distance, since "displacement" is "change in distance" which is "final distance minus original distance")


Say at time zero, the distance is also at zero (in other words, the distance-time graph passes through the origin)

Now suppose the graph goes through some crazy wacky curve, but at time 10 seconds, the distance is 100 meters.

The displacement (after 10 seconds) will be 100 meters, regardless of how the graph curves.


Final distance = 100 meters
Original distance = 0 meters (I said that the distance is 0 when the time is 0)

Displacement = 100 - 0 = 100
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #15
Oh, sorry, I meant how to calculate the distance OF the line. I understand how to get displacement
 
  • #16
ichigo said:
Oh, sorry, I meant how to calculate the distance OF the line. I understand how to get displacement

Ok now I don't understand what you mean.

You want the distance of the line? I can't think of any reason you would need to know that (at least not with a distance-time graph)

It depends on the line. A horizontal line (a constant) is trivial.

A straight line (with a slope) is also somewhat trivial (with pythagorean theorem).

Curvy lines are no longer trivial
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #17
All good, if that's not useful, then they won't be giving that to me on the exam. Thankyou very much for your help, I really appreciate it!
 
  • #18
ichigo said:
All good, if that's not useful, then they won't be giving that to me on the exam. Thankyou very much for your help, I really appreciate it!

No problem
 

1. What are the most important topics to focus on for a Physics exam in 5 hours?

The most important topics to focus on for a Physics exam in 5 hours are the fundamental concepts and principles, such as Newton's laws of motion, work and energy, and electricity and magnetism. It is also important to review any specific equations or formulas that may be required for the exam.

2. How can I effectively study for a Physics exam in such a short amount of time?

To effectively study for a Physics exam in 5 hours, it is important to prioritize your review by focusing on the most important topics and practicing with sample problems. It may also be helpful to create study aids, such as flashcards or summary notes, to help you quickly review key information.

3. What are some tips for managing my time during a Physics exam?

During a Physics exam, it is important to manage your time effectively to ensure that you have enough time to answer all of the questions. One tip is to quickly skim through the entire exam to get an idea of the types of questions and their point values. Then, allocate your time accordingly and don't spend too much time on any one question.

4. How can I stay calm and focused during a Physics exam?

To stay calm and focused during a Physics exam, it is important to take deep breaths and remind yourself that you have prepared for this exam. Avoid getting stuck on difficult questions and move on to easier ones to build your confidence. Also, make sure to take breaks if needed and stay hydrated.

5. Should I focus on understanding concepts or memorizing equations for a Physics exam?

Both understanding concepts and memorizing equations are important for a Physics exam. However, it is more important to have a solid understanding of the underlying concepts in order to apply them to various problems and scenarios. Memorizing equations can be helpful, but it is more important to know how to use them correctly rather than just being able to recall them.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
635
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
372
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
952
Back
Top