Physics past paper question - hard disks

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving hard disks, specifically calculating the number of magnets per disk based on frequency and magnet length. The user correctly identified the frequency as 120 Hz and calculated the circumference as 0.2796 m using the formula π*d. The key takeaway is that the number of magnets per disk is determined by dividing the circumference by the length of each magnet, emphasizing the importance of understanding the geometry of the magnets in relation to the disk's circumference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as frequency and circumference
  • Familiarity with the geometry of circular objects
  • Knowledge of magnetization and its application in hard disk technology
  • Ability to interpret and analyze physics diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of magnetization in hard disk drives
  • Learn about the relationship between frequency and data storage in magnetic media
  • Explore the geometry of circular motion and its applications in physics problems
  • Study the effects of magnet dimensions on data density in hard disks
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and mechanical systems, as well as professionals in the field of data storage technology.

jsmith613
Messages
609
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




I have attached the question

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



so the first thing I did was find the frequency = 120 Hz
The next thing I did was find the circumference = 0.2796 m (from pi*d)

Now I know that the answer is no. magnets per disk * 120
BUT I am told the LENGTH of a magnet not the width (I know exacly what I have to do - circumerence / length of magnet = no. magnet per disk) but I cannot see why this works (I have the MS so I know I had to do that)

Please could someone explain why this is the case

thanks
 

Attachments

  • HardDisk.png
    HardDisk.png
    33.5 KB · Views: 539
Physics news on Phys.org
well it seems to me actually this is the ONLY way to look at it...I will put the issue down to semantics.

never mind :)
 
The "length occupied by each separate magnetized region" is its length along the circumference of the circle that the head is reading.

I suspect that you were thinking of the length corresponding to the radial lengths of the magnets depicted in the diagram (since clearly they show the magnets being longer in the radial direction than the circumferential direction), so you were thinking that what you really needed was the widths of those magnets. In this case it may be that the given diagram has caused some confusion due to assumptions it led you to make on the geometry being described in the problem itself.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K