Physics Problem Help: Find Total Force on Q4

  • Thread starter Thread starter suf7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the total force exerted on a fourth charge (Q4 = +5.0 nC) by three point charges (Q1 = +2.0 nC, Q2 = -3.0 nC, Q3 = -10.0 nC) positioned along the x-axis. Participants emphasize the application of Coulomb's Law, specifically the formula F = (Q1 * Q4) / (4πε₀r²), to determine the forces from each charge on Q4. The discussion concludes with the calculation of the total force on Q4, resulting in a net force of -6.74 * 10^-5 N, indicating that Q4 is repelled by Q1 and attracted by Q2 and Q3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law for point charges
  • Understanding of electric charge units (nanoCoulombs to Coulombs)
  • Basic vector addition for forces
  • Knowledge of the concept of electric force directionality
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Coulomb's Law in electrostatics.
  • Learn about vector addition and its importance in physics problems involving forces.
  • Explore the concept of electric field and its relationship with point charges.
  • Investigate the implications of charge interactions in different configurations.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to electric forces and charge interactions.

  • #31
arildno said:
You should have (I include the sign (direction) for the force):
F=-\frac{10.0*10^{-18}C^{2}}{4\pi*\epsilon_{0}*2.5m^{2}*10^{-3}}
If I understand your calculation correctly, you placed the 10^{-18} factor in your denominator, rather than in your numerator.

its the "2.5m^2" and the "10^-3", i don't know where they come from??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
All right!
The DISTANCE between Q1 and Q4 (that is, what I've called r_{41})
is:
r_{41}= 0.05m=5*10^{-2}m
Hence,
r_{41}^{2}=25*10^{-4}m^{2}=2.5*10^{-3}*m^{2}
is that cleared up now?
 
  • #33
arildno said:
All right!
The DISTANCE between Q1 and Q4 (that is, what I've called r_{41})
is:
r_{41}= 0.05m=5*10^{-2}m
Hence,
r_{41}^{2}=25*10^{-4}m^{2}=2.5*10^{-3}*m^{2}
is that cleared up now?

ok, i think that makes sense...so is this right??
f = (10*10^-18) / (4pi)(Eo)(2.5*10^-3)
= 3.597*10^-5
 
  • #34
That seems much better..:smile:
And in which direction does this force push Q4?
(That's VERY important to know!)
 
  • #35
thanks..phew, uve actually taught me soemthing, thanks to you it makes a lot more sense..your explanations have been really good, sorry if i annoyed u with my lack of intelligence..lol..erm, not sure, how can u tell the direction of push??
 
  • #36
Can you now go back to my post "16" and see if you understand my reasoning there?
(Don't let the vectors frighten you!)
Just post again if there's something you don't get there..
 
  • #37
arildno said:
That is correct, as long as you remember that the implied direction is AWAY from Q4.
On vector form, we have:
\vec{F}_{41}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{Q_{1}Q_{4}}{r_{41}^{2}}\frac{\vec{r}_{4}-\vec{r}_{1}}{r_{41}}
EXPLANATIONS:
1)Here, I have included the last fraction to have the basic direction explicitly included.
2)\vec{F}_{41} means: The force acting on Q4 from Q1
3) r_{41} is the DISTANCE between Q1 and Q4, that is, some positive number.
CALCULATIONS:
Q1=2.0 nC
Q4=5.0 nC
Hence, Q1*Q4=10.0(nC)^{2}
\vec{r}_{4}=\vec{0} (that is, situated at the origin)
\vec{r}_{1}= 0.05m\vec{i}
(that is, situated 0.05m to the right-hand side of Q4 at the origin)
Hence, \vec{r}_{4}-\vec{r}_{1}=-0.05m\vec{i}
That is, the direction indicated by this quantity is leftwards.

r_{41}=0.05m that is the DISTANCE between Q1 and Q4 is 0.05m

Collecting all together, we have:
\vec{F}_{41}=-\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{10.0(nC)^{2}}{(0.05m)^{2}}\vec{i}

That is, the force on Q4 from Q1 is directed leftwards.
Q4 tends to be REPELLED from Q1, because they have EQUAL TYPE OF CHARGE!
Was this okay?

isnt my calculation incorrect because i never put the "-" in front of the 0.05??
so that makes the direction negative right?
 
  • #38
suf7 said:
isnt my calculation incorrect because i never put the "-" in front of the 0.05??
so that makes the direction negative right?
I chose not to pick on that, because I sensed there were more pressing issues at hand.
In addition, since your calculation basically (and after a while, correctly) gave how "big" the force should be, I thought I might postpone the introduction of the sign.
Note that I did include it in my post (20) as well..

You are right, the minus sign gained from (16) shows that the force on Q4 works in the negative direction.
This expresses the simple fact that since Q1 and Q4 are electrical charges with the SAME SIGN, they will tend to REPEL each other.
 
  • #39
that is really great...i can't thank you enough...i really appreciate all the time and effort you have spent on me, I've learned a lot...i think i should be able to complete the question now and when i have finished it i will post it and "HopeFully" it will be correct...lol...thanks again, you are a very good teacher!
 
  • #40
No prob!
As you probably can see, what remains now is to calculate the force from Q2 on Q4 and the force from Q3 on Q4, and add the results together.

Be careful with your signs!
 
  • #41
Q1 - Q4: = -3.597*10^-5
Q2 - Q4: = 1.348*10^-5
Q3 - Q4: = -4.49*10^-5

(-3.597*10^-5)+(1.348*10^-5)+(-4.49*10^-5) = -6.74*10^-5


have i made any mistakes?...is this the right answer?...-6.74*10^-5
 
  • #42
You have the right signs, and the magnitudes look all right.
So, on the whole (without having calculated the quantities myself), it definitely smells like a correct answer.
 
  • #43
thanks for your help, I am grateful!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K