Physics problem - Salmon jumping waterfall

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a salmon jumping a waterfall, where the participant attempts to calculate the required speed using energy conservation principles. The initial equation presented is critiqued for its unclear variables and incorrect substitutions, particularly regarding the height and trajectory of the jump. Concerns are raised about the misunderstanding of projectile motion, emphasizing the need for a clear diagram to visualize the relationship between the jump's parameters. Suggestions are made to derive a more accurate equation for the parabolic trajectory that incorporates the angle of projection and horizontal distance. The consensus is that the initial approach lacks clarity and needs refinement to correctly solve the problem.
FlowiwGhar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Salmon often jump waterfalls to reach their
breeding grounds.
Starting downstream, 2.73 m away from a
waterfall 0.614 m in height, at what minimum
speed must a salmon jumping at an angle of
26.7◦
leave the water to continue upstream?
The acceleration due to gravity is 9.81 m/s^2.
Answer in units of m/s.
Relevant Equations
N/A
m * g * h + (1/2) * m * v² = m * g * y

Simplifying the equation:

g * h + (1/2) * v² = g * y

Substituting the values:

g * 0.614 + (1/2) * v² = g * 2.73 * sin(26.7°)

Now, let's solve for v:

(1/2) * v² = g * 2.73 * sin(26.7°) - g * 0.614

v² = 2 * (g * 2.73 * sin(26.7°) - g * 0.614)

v = √(2 * (g * 2.73 * sin(26.7°) - g * 0.614))

Substituting the value of g = 9.81 m/s² and performing the calculations:

v ≈ √(2 * (9.81 * 2.73 * sin(26.7°) - 9.81 * 0.614))

v ≈ √(2 * (53.803 - 6.018))

v ≈ √(2 * 47.785)

v ≈ √95.57

v ≈ 9.78 m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FlowiwGhar said:
Homework Statement: Salmon often jump waterfalls to reach their
breeding grounds.
Starting downstream, 2.73 m away from a
waterfall 0.614 m in height, at what minimum
speed must a salmon jumping at an angle of
26.7◦
leave the water to continue upstream?
The acceleration due to gravity is 9.81 m/s^2.
Answer in units of m/s.
Relevant Equations: N/A

m * g * h + (1/2) * m * v² = m * g * y

Simplifying the equation:

g * h + (1/2) * v² = g * y

Substituting the values:

g * 0.614 + (1/2) * v² = g * 2.73 * sin(26.7°)

Now, let's solve for v:

(1/2) * v² = g * 2.73 * sin(26.7°) - g * 0.614

v² = 2 * (g * 2.73 * sin(26.7°) - g * 0.614)

v = √(2 * (g * 2.73 * sin(26.7°) - g * 0.614))

Substituting the value of g = 9.81 m/s² and performing the calculations:

v ≈ √(2 * (9.81 * 2.73 * sin(26.7°) - 9.81 * 0.614))

v ≈ √(2 * (53.803 - 6.018))

v ≈ √(2 * 47.785)

v ≈ √95.57

v ≈ 9.78 m/s
Have you posted this because you want someone to check it or because you have some reason to think your answer is wrong?
 
haruspex said:
Have you posted this because you want someone to check it or because you have some reason to think your answer is wrong?
The answer is incorrect, so I'd like someone to check it please
 
There is nothing to check. Your formulas and the values you plugged in looks like some random manipulation of symbols. For example., what is the meaning of the variable labeled "y" in your first equation? What is the meaning of the first equation and how is relevant to the problem?
 
Judging from your equations, y-h is the height the salmon would clear the dam by were it not for gravity. How that leads to your equation is mysterious. E.g. you add the KE to the PE needed to reach the top of the dam (mgh), but the PE is partly spent on that.
Start with sound physical principles and write equations from those.
 
From your energy conservation equation it appears that ##y-h## is the height which the salmon reaches with zero speed. Is that what is happening here? As you know from projectile motion problems, the horizontal component of the velocity is constant. That means that the speed is never zero unless the fish jumps straight up which is not the case here.

Furthermore, it seems that you have misunderstood how to relate the given quantities to each other. In your equation you substitute ##y=2.73\sin(26.7^{\circ}).## That is incorrect and makes no sense. Draw a diagram showing ##y##, ##h##, the 2.73 m horizontal distance and the roughly parabolic trajectory of the fish to guide your thinking.

I would carry @haruspex 's suggestion one step further and recommend that you write an equation for the parabolic trajectory that relates the vertical displacement to the horizontal displacement, the initial speed and the angle of projection.

I note that since the angle of projection and the displacement of the salmon are all specified, there is no real minimization to be done.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top