Why Am I Getting Strange Results Measuring Sphere Densities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rawr101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Spheres
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on accurately measuring the density of spheres using water displacement in a graduated cylinder. The user initially misapplied the formula for linear mass density, which is inappropriate for this context. Instead, the correct approach involves calculating density by dividing the mass of the sphere by the volume of water displaced, derived from the difference between initial and final water levels. Key considerations include ensuring proper unit conversions from liters to cubic meters or grams to cubic centimeters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly density and volume displacement.
  • Familiarity with graduated cylinders and measuring water levels.
  • Knowledge of unit conversions between liters and cubic meters.
  • Basic mathematical skills for calculating density (mass/volume).
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of Archimedes' principle related to buoyancy and displacement.
  • Learn about unit conversions in the metric system, specifically from liters to cubic meters and grams to cubic centimeters.
  • Explore density calculations for various materials and their implications in physics experiments.
  • Study the differences between linear mass density and volumetric density in physical contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students in introductory physics courses, educators teaching density and volume concepts, and anyone conducting experiments involving fluid displacement and density measurements.

rawr101
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
My question is regarding finding volume and densities of spheres. I'm getting strange results, so I thought I'd find out where my methods are incorrect.

I am using a graduated cylinder to drop the spheres into with water inside. I measured the initial volume of the water before I dropped the sphere in. Then I measured it after. I now have the mass, the initial volume (ml) of water, and the final volume of water (along with the uncertainties, using hi-low method :biggrin: ).

Should I use the formula: Linear Mass Density = Mass/Liter?


Thanks for helping.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you say that you now have the mass, do you mean they gave it to you already or you calculated it from the data? If you say you calculated it from the data, I see what your problem is right away. The sphere does not displace an equal mass of water, but an equal volume. If you dropped a metal ball in that wieghed one gram, and another ball of the same size made of a material so dense it wieghed 1 kilogram, they would both displace the same volume of water since the beaker is equally filled in both cases. It is when objects float that they displace an equal mass of water. There is a minor technical problem with the formula you are using and that is that you are not trying to find a linear mass density, just a density. A linear mass density is something you would measure on a rope or chain and say that it wieghs so many kilograms per meter. But that's just a technical point. If you divide the mass by the volume, you will get the density. The only other problem that comes to mind is to make sure your units are right. What is wrong with the data exactly?
 
LeonhardEuler said:
When you say that you now have the mass, do you mean they gave it to you already or you calculated it from the data? If you say you calculated it from the data, I see what your problem is right away. The sphere does not displace an equal mass of water, but an equal volume. If you dropped a metal ball in that wieghed one gram, and another ball of the same size made of a material so dense it wieghed 1 kilogram, they would both displace the same volume of water since the beaker is equally filled in both cases. It is when objects float that they displace an equal mass of water. There is a minor technical problem with the formula you are using and that is that you are not trying to find a linear mass density, just a density. A linear mass density is something you would measure on a rope or chain and say that it wieghs so many kilograms per meter. But that's just a technical point. If you divide the mass by the volume, you will get the density. The only other problem that comes to mind is to make sure your units are right. What is wrong with the data exactly?

The goal for me is to find the densities. I weighed the metal spheres first and then recorded the initial water volume. I dropped the sphere in and measured the current water level. I'm just curious whether the equation, Linear Mass Density = Mass/Liter, will give me the correct densities I am looking for. Or would this work:

Volume Water Displaced = Final Volume - Initial Volume
volume water displaced = volume

then density = mass/volume

Sorry for these very beginner questions, this is my first physics class :confused: .

Thanks again.
 
yes, this will give you the density, just rememner that you need to find density in grams per cm^3 or kg per m^3. You need to make sure you convert from volume of water to the metric system. 1000L = 1m^3.

Regards,

Nenad
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K