Picket Fence Lab: Measuring Gravity Acceleration vs Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Want to learn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Measuring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the acceleration vs. time graph for an object in free fall, specifically in the context of the Picket Fence Lab experiment. It is established that the acceleration remains constant at approximately 9.8 m/s² during free fall, contrary to the initial assumption that it would increase over time. The confusion arose from conflating acceleration with velocity, which does increase linearly in free fall. The correct interpretation is that while velocity increases, acceleration remains constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concept of free fall
  • Basic knowledge of graph interpretation in physics
  • Awareness of gravitational acceleration (g = 9.8 m/s²)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between acceleration and velocity in free fall
  • Explore the implications of the inverse square law on gravitational acceleration
  • Learn how to graph acceleration vs. time and velocity vs. time for free-fall scenarios
  • Investigate the effects of air resistance on free-fall acceleration
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of free fall and gravitational acceleration.

Want to learn
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



My question is. How would the acceleration vs. time graph look if an object was in free fall?

I am referring here to the picket fence lab.




The Attempt at a Solution



My brain tells me, that it would be a horizontal line. But when I think about it, it doesn't really make sense because when the picket fence enters through the photogate the acceleration can't possible be 9.80 m/s^2 , it has to increase over time. So now, I am thinking that the acceleration vs time graph is going to be exactly the same as the velocity vs time graph which is just a increasing line. Is my reasoning correct, or am I not making any sense.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first idea is the correct one in this case.
In free-fall the acceleration is constant (that is, in free fall over small distances -- when you are talking about distances of several km above the Earth surface, you should use the full 1/r2 law).

Why should the acceleration increase over time? You are confusing it with velocity, which does. However, the increase of the velocity in each time step is constant, which is precisely what a = [/i]g[/i] (9,8... m/s/s) says.
 
CompuChip said:
Your first idea is the correct one in this case.
In free-fall the acceleration is constant (that is, in free fall over small distances -- when you are talking about distances of several km above the Earth surface, you should use the full 1/r2 law).

Why should the acceleration increase over time? You are confusing it with velocity, which does. However, the increase of the velocity in each time step is constant, which is precisely what a = [/i]g[/i] (9,8... m/s/s) says.

Ahh, i see. Yes I didn't think about the small distance at all. Great, thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
505
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K