Piecewise continuous -> NO vertical asymptotes

  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous Vertical
Click For Summary
A piecewise continuous function cannot have vertical asymptotes due to its definition, which allows only removable and step discontinuities. Continuous pieces of such functions do not exhibit asymptotic behavior, as they are defined for all x without infinite limits. While some interpretations might suggest that a function like f(x)=1/x could be piecewise continuous, it contradicts the standard definition that restricts discontinuities to isolated points with finite limits. Therefore, under conventional definitions, vertical asymptotes are indeed impossible for piecewise continuous functions. Understanding these definitions is crucial for accurately discussing the properties of such functions.
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Physics news on Phys.org


it's not impossible. you link says a piecewise-continuous function may not have vertical asymptotes, and it gives an example of one that doesn't :wink:
 


fourier jr said:
it's not impossible. you link says a piecewise-continuous function may not have vertical asymptotes, and it gives an example of one that doesn't :wink:

But it then goes on to say that "the only possible types of discontinuities for a piecewise continuous function are removable and step discontinuities." So it seems that vertical asymptotes ARE impossible!
 


"A function made up of a finite number of continuous pieces..."

It is not possible since anyone of these continuous pieces cannot have a single asymptote. Continuous functions that define these pieces are continuous in that they don't have asymptotes.
 


The function y = 1/x for x not zero has a vertical asymptote at x = 0. I don't think you will find any text that will say otherwise. The picture on that website shows a function that is defined for all x. I think what they are trying to say is that a piecewise continuous function that is defined for all x can have no vertical asymptote. Hypotheses matter.
 


It's simply part of the definition.

If you simply defined "piecewise continuous" to mean that a function has finitely many discontinuities, then a function like f(x)=1/x would satisfy that criterion (whether the function exists at x=0, is actually somewhat irrelevant in this case as we could define f(0)=0 for example). And this would give you a piecewise continuous function with a vertical asymptote.

However, most (useful) definitions of piecewise continuity involve other conditions to restrict the function from having asymptotes. If the function is continuous at all but finitely many points, each discontinuity must be isolated, meaning that at a particular discontinuous point x, the right hand and left hand limits of f exist. A typical added restriction is for all right and left hand limits to be finite for all points.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K