Identifying Vertical Asymptotes: A Non-Factoring Method

  • Context:
  • Thread starter Thread starter Teh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Vertical
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
Teh
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6087
im stuck on identifying vertical asymptotes because of this nasty denominator. My professor telling me to factor it out but, is there different way to solve for the vertical asymptotes.
 

Attachments

  • 14642706_1490190584343062_450543411_n.jpg
    14642706_1490190584343062_450543411_n.jpg
    80 KB · Views: 125
Physics news on Phys.org
the said:
im stuck on identifying vertical asymptotes because of this nasty denominator. My professor telling me to factor it out but, is there different way to solve for the vertical asymptotes.
Other than graphing, not that I know of.

You need to factor [math]x^4 - 61x^2 + 900[/math]. If you set [math]y = x^2[/math] then you have to factor [math]y^2 - 61y + 900[/math]. Are you able to do that?

-Dan
 
i did! for the denominator it is (x+5) (x+6) (x-5) (x-6) for the top i am not sure
 
the said:
i did! for the denominator it is (x+5) (x+6) (x-5) (x-6) for the top i am not sure

Surely you can at least see some common factors...
 
yes also did tried it this is what i got 2x^2 (x^2 + x - 30) is equal to 2x^2 (x-6) (x+5)... then cancel it out with (x-6) (x+5)
 
Your factorization of the numerator is close, but not quite correct...check your signs. :D
 
ahhh okay (x+6) and (x-5) canceling with (x+6) (x-5) leaving 2x^2 / (x-6) (x+5)