Pilot wave theory and quantum tunneling

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on pilot wave theory as an alternative to standard quantum mechanics (SQM), particularly in relation to recent findings on quantum tunneling. Participants explore whether these findings support the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics while potentially undermining the deterministic nature of pilot wave theory.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the validity of a claim regarding instantaneous quantum tunneling, seeking a peer-reviewed source to substantiate it.
  • One participant provides a link to a publication that purportedly discusses the findings related to quantum tunneling.
  • Another participant argues that the Copenhagen interpretation and pilot wave theory yield the same measurable predictions, suggesting that compatibility with one does not necessarily invalidate the other.
  • There are claims in the literature that pilot wave theory predicts different tunneling times, but some participants consider these claims to be misleading.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the recent findings for pilot wave theory and the Copenhagen interpretation, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of peer-reviewed sources for claims made in the discussion, highlighting the need for further examination of the cited research.

johnob
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Just a question about pilot wave theory as an alternative to SQM. Researchers in ANU have recently shown that quantum tunnelling of a particle through a barrier is instantaneous. Does this finding verify the Copenhagen superposition interpretation of QM and at the same time invalidate the deterministic pilot wave theory.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Physics news on Phys.org
johnob said:
Researchers in ANU have recently shown ...

You'll have to provide more of a citation than that - there's no way any of us can say anything sensible about a piece of research that we haven't yet seen. Where is the peer-reviewed publication of this result?
 
Apologies for the omission. That is the publication I'm referring to.
 
johnob said:
Does this finding verify the Copenhagen superposition interpretation of QM and at the same time invalidate the deterministic pilot wave theory.
Copenhagen interpretation and pilot wave theory have the same measurable predictions. If the experiment is compatible with the former, then it is also compatible with the latter.

There have been claims in the literature that pilot wave theory makes different predictions for the tunneling time. But such claims are misleading, as explained e.g. in
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/1307.4366v3 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 220404 (2013)]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K