Planck's constant and the matter constituents

  • Thread starter Thread starter redtree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Matter
redtree
Messages
335
Reaction score
15
What is the relationship between Planck's constant and the energy of fermions (matter constituents) at rest?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i did write something then realized it was hideously wrong because you asked for rest energy :P
 
E = \hbar \omega where \omega = \frac{1}{\hbar} \sqrt{0^2 c^2+ m^2 c^4}, no?
 
redtree said:
What is the relationship between Planck's constant and the energy of fermions (matter constituents) at rest?

Planck's constant is merely a conversion factor, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0208093" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Thread 'Is It Known For Sure Infinites In QFT Are Caused Using a Continuum?'

I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
View full post »
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'

Thread 'Lesser Green's function'

The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Reduced Planck Constant vs Dark Matter?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I If the gravitational constant had a different value
Replies
13
Views
1K
B A quick question about Planck's constant
Replies
6
Views
1K
I Planck’s constant: Why are atom vibration frequencies integers only?
Replies
9
Views
1K
I Chunks of action smaller than Planck's constant
Replies
2
Views
1K
I The Wavefunction when Mass is Much Greater than Planck's Constant
Replies
21
Views
2K
B What does the unit "Js" of the Planck constant mean?
Replies
9
Views
5K
I Understanding Planck's Quantum of Action for Beginners
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Does the energy 6.626x10^-34J have any special meaning?
Replies
26
Views
3K
B Is the probability of a quantum outcome ever zero such as with....
Replies
4
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top