sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 30,059
- 7,373
It's what 'everyone' does these days. Long exposures allow us to record very faint images and also 'see' the colours.enorbet said:Lately I've been wondering if there is any practicality in using CCDs transmitting telescopic images to a PC/Laptop and Monitor especially at longer exposure times since the more dim and distant objects appear to us with relatively small displacement that would make for fuzzy imaging. Has anyone here experimented with this?
Star Trails are present for even quite short exposures and gets worse for high magnification. We need Tracking.
Equatorial ('polar') mounts allow the scope to move around a polar axis and you can follow a star manually by moving the scope with just the one control.
Clockwork motors replaced the operator and that's what the very best observatories used to achieve tracking. Nowadays, the tracking is done with an electric motor and, of course CCD or CMOS sensors.
There's a limit to how good tracking can be and now we use Guiding, which involves servo control to keep a chosen 'guide star' at a given position on the sensor. It's usual to use a smaller guide scope, locked onto a bright enough star and a main scope to image small / faint objects that couldn't be used for guiding.
Don't go buying anything until you know enough to know what you want - you can spend much more than you can afford unless you are really well informed although there are some very good low cost solutions.