Plasma Impedance Matching Network

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on developing an algorithm for a plasma impedance L-type matching network, which successfully tunes for minimum standing wave ratio (SWR) with non-plasma loads but fails with plasma, resulting in high reflected power. Users suggest that the impedance changes due to plasma acting as a capacitor or inductor and that fluctuations in pressure may affect plasma density and impedance. The chamber operates at a pressure of 1.3 Torr, with some fluctuations noted, which could impact performance. The presence of different plasma modes and the RF frequency of 13.56 MHz are also relevant factors in the impedance tuning process. Overall, the tuning algorithm may require adjustments to account for the unique characteristics of plasma loads.
Fikadu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

is there anyone with plasma background?

I am developing an algorithm for a plasma impedance L type matching network.

Initially, I set the Load and Tune units to some specific positions. The algorithm is simply tuning a possible minimum SWR starting from the initial position towards the minimum or maximum position of the units and set back to a position where minimum SWR occurred.

This works for non- plasma loads. But, while testing with plasma, after completing the tuning and setting back to the exact position where minimum SWR happened, it results in largely different SWR and high reflected power reading. I couldn't find out why this happens.

would you help me please?
Thank you a lot
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
It appears the path you take in the minimum SWR search is changing the result. Maybe you must approach from the same starting point or run the algorithm twice.
What is the RF excitation frequency?
What are the approximate dimensions of the plasma chamber?
How do you measure the SWR?
Are there a number of different modes available within the chamber?
Is variation in adjustment changing the mode?
 
Fikadu said:
Dear all,

is there anyone with plasma background?

I am developing an algorithm for a plasma impedance L type matching network.

Initially, I set the Load and Tune units to some specific positions. The algorithm is simply tuning a possible minimum SWR starting from the initial position towards the minimum or maximum position of the units and set back to a position where minimum SWR occurred.

This works for non- plasma loads. But, while testing with plasma, after completing the tuning and setting back to the exact position where minimum SWR happened, it results in largely different SWR and high reflected power reading. I couldn't find out why this happens.

would you help me please?
Thank you a lot
The plasma changes the impedance of your system. It can act as a capacitor or an inductor.

What kind of antenna are you using to generate the plasma? Inductive, capacitive?

Some inductive type antennas have three plasma modes which can exist - E,L,H - depending on the power used and how well the antenna is coupling. Transistioning of these modes cause abrupt changes to the impedance. When entering the H mode from the L mode - reflectance can drop significantly. The http://www.megawavz.com/product.aspx?id=333276 that we have needs to be tuned by hand while the RF source is on. This is for calibration.

At what pressure is the plasma being generated? How well regulated is the vacuum system? If you are operating in the mTorr range, and your pressures are fluctuating, then the plasma density will fluctuate as well, causing the impedance to change, causing the auto tuner to constantly compensate.
 
Baluncore said:
Welcome to PF.
It appears the path you take in the minimum SWR search is changing the result. Maybe you must approach from the same starting point or run the algorithm twice.
What is the RF excitation frequency?
What are the approximate dimensions of the plasma chamber?
How do you measure the SWR?
Are there a number of different modes available within the chamber?
Is variation in adjustment changing the mode?

Dear, Thank you very much for your help.

1. The RF frequency is 13.56MHz.
2. The dimension of the chamber ≈ 50 cm x 60cm x 30 cm( Width x Length x Height )
3. The RF Voltage , Current and phase difference are captured through VI sensor. From these, Forward power, reflected power and then SWR is computed.
4. There is no mode option with in the Chamber.

Thank you once again.
 
Helmholtzerton said:
The plasma changes the impedance of your system. It can act as a capacitor or an inductor.

What kind of antenna are you using to generate the plasma? Inductive, capacitive?

Some inductive type antennas have three plasma modes which can exist - E,L,H - depending on the power used and how well the antenna is coupling. Transistioning of these modes cause abrupt changes to the impedance. When entering the H mode from the L mode - reflectance can drop significantly.The http://www.megawavz.com/product.aspx?id=333276 that we have needs to be tuned by hand while the RF source is on. This is for calibration.

At what pressure is the plasma being generated? How well regulated is the vacuum system? If you are operating in the mTorr range, and your pressures are fluctuating, then the plasma density will fluctuate as well, causing the impedance to change, causing the auto tuner to constantly compensate.

Dear Helmholtzerton,

Thank you very much for your helpful comment.

Depend on power frequency , the Chamber operates as inductive or capacitive. Plasma is being generated at a pressure of 1.3 torr. But some times it fluctuates up and down. might this be a reason?

Thank you a lot
 
Fikadu said:
Dear Helmholtzerton,

Thank you very much for your helpful comment.

Depend on power frequency , the Chamber operates as inductive or capacitive. Plasma is being generated at a pressure of 1.3 torr. But some times it fluctuates up and down. might this be a reason?

Thank you a lot

At around 2 Torr is when I'm able to start to break down air into plasma. - but with that high of a pressure, fluctuations haven't been a problem with a simple hand value to control pressure.

When I am in the mili Torr region, say 10mTorr, it is much easier to see swings in pressure without proper equipment. If the pressure were to fluctuate 5-10%, the reflected reading will jump around as plasma generation is effected by how many neutrals are in the chamber. Pressure is associated with neutrals. Once we opted to use a mass flow controller, these pressure swings were no longer an issue.

I don't see fluctuations being much of a problem at 1.3 Torr. Are you seeing wide pressure swings? By how much?

If your algorithm simply seeks to find the minimum SWR from some information being feed to the device - how well shielded is this system? 13.56MHz could be effecting this signal. Just plug a simple loop antenna into an oscilloscope and hold it up in the room where the plasma is produced. You might be surprised by how much RF you pick up.
 
  • Like
Likes Douglas Sunday
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Thread 'Where is my curb stop?'
My water meter is submerged under water for about 95% of the year. Today I took a photograph of the inside of my water meter box because today is one of the rare days that my water meter is not submerged in water. Here is the photograph that I took of my water meter with the cover on: Here is a photograph I took of my water meter with the cover off: I edited the photograph to draw a red circle around a knob on my water meter. Is that knob that I drew a red circle around my meter...
Back
Top