How do we prevent the fusion reactor chamber from melting?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The prevention of the fusion reactor chamber from melting is primarily achieved through the use of strong magnetic fields to contain the high-temperature plasma. The ITER project represents the most advanced tokamak reactor currently under development, utilizing a combination of magnetic fields generated by plasma currents and external coils. In contrast, stellarators like Wendelstein 7-X rely solely on magnetic fields produced by coils, without the need for plasma current. Both approaches effectively maintain the necessary distance between the plasma and the chamber walls to prevent melting.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tokamak reactor design and operation
  • Familiarity with stellarator technology and its principles
  • Knowledge of plasma physics and high-temperature plasma behavior
  • Basic concepts of magnetic confinement in fusion reactors
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the ITER project and its technological advancements in fusion energy
  • Explore the design and functionality of the Wendelstein 7-X stellarator
  • Study the principles of magnetic confinement and its applications in fusion reactors
  • Investigate the differences between tokamak and stellarator magnetic field configurations
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and researchers involved in fusion energy development, as well as students studying plasma physics and magnetic confinement technologies.

woonjy2013
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
this question might be a bit stupid, but if the plasma in the fusion reactor has very high temperature, then how do we make the chamber not melt? i mean, not to join? contact? each other(chamber wall and plasma).
do we use magnetic field to make the distance? then how do we do that?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Last edited:
rootone said:
There is at least one other approach which is not entirely reliant on magnetic confinement, although that is still a part of the story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendelstein_7-X

This statement is very misleading. It is true that there are alternatives to magnetic confinement.
However, stellarators like Wendelstein rely entirely of magnetic confinement.
 
thanks!
 
OK thanks for that correction, I had thought that the stellarator project used a combination of containment methods, with magnetism being one, but didn't have time to recheck on that.
 
Both tokamak and stellarator use magnetic fields only. Just the origin of the field is different: Tokamaks need a magnetic field component that has to come from a plasma current (together with the stronger fields from coils), stellarators work with magnetic fields from coils only.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K