Please tell me, where I have to post new research.

  • Thread starter Thread starter URAIN
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
New research discussions are restricted to peer-reviewed publications in the forums. The guidelines prohibit topics based on personal websites, self-published works, or challenges to mainstream scientific theories without professional backing. Discussions must be grounded in established scientific literature or textbooks. The forum is not a substitute for professional venues for feedback or development of new theories. Therefore, any unverified research should not be posted here.
URAIN
I have discussed some thing in other forums. Now I would like to discuss new research thing here.

Therefore please guide me, where (in which section) I have to discuss this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the forums. I'm afraid the answer is nowhere unless you have published in a peer-reviewed journal, please read the PF rules. Specifically:
rules said:
In the science discussion forums we do not allow the following:

• Discussion of theories that appear only on personal web sites, self-published books, etc.
• Challenges to mainstream theories (relativity, the Big Bang, etc.) that go beyond current professional discussion
• Attempts to promote or resuscitate theories that have been discredited or superseded (e.g. Lorentz ether theory); this does not exclude discussion of those theories in a purely historical context
• Personal theories or speculations that go beyond or counter to generally-accepted science
• Mixing science and religion, e.g. using religious doctrines in support of scientific arguments or vice versa.

Links to web sites that fall in the categories listed above will be removed.

Generally, discussion topics should be traceable to standard textbooks or to peer-reviewed scientific literature.
 
Thank you Ryan for your guidance.

I always fallow forum rules. Therefore I have asked.

Till now I have not touched the peer reiview journals. I have discussed it in two science forums. After discussion in science forum, I have written a separate article in same science forum.

At starting I have got objection. But when I presented that with scientific method and when I was given testable predictions, they were not objected me.

I think it is better to share with you by Personnel Message.
 
If it hasn't already been published in a peer-reviewed journal, we don't discuss it here. Quoting the rules again:

Physics Forums is not intended as an alternative to the usual professional venues for discussion and review of new ideas, e.g. personal contacts, conferences, and peer review before publication. If you have a new theory or idea, this is not the place to look for feedback on it or help in developing it.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top