Plot a photon on a space-time diagram

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around plotting a photon on a space-time diagram, specifically a Minkowski diagram, and understanding the implications of different reference frames. Participants explore the characteristics of light cones and the relationship between the photon's motion and inertial frames.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question which branch of the light cone the photon should be plotted on and the implications of its position along that branch. There is discussion about the existence of a reference frame for the photon and the nature of proper time. Some participants express confusion about the relationship between the photon and a spaceship traveling at a fraction of the speed of light.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts involved, with some participants providing clarifications and questioning assumptions about the reference frames. The conversation indicates a productive exchange of ideas, though no consensus has been reached regarding the specifics of plotting the photon.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints related to the complexity of the full problem statement and the need for additional details to clarify the context of the discussion. There is also a reference to the relationship between the frequency of the photon and the relative velocity of the source and observer.

pepediaz
Messages
49
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
If a spaceship travelling at 0.866c throws a photon towards the Earth, plot the space-time diagram of the photon, in Earth frame and in photon's frame.
Relevant Equations
none
I think that if we plot an inertial frame in the XY axis separated 90º, the photon, which has a velocity of c, should be put on one of the branches of the light cone. The questions are:

Which branch, left or right one?
Which position along the branch, if I don't know the distance it has travelled?
The time in the inertial frame is greater than the time on the photon's reference system? (I suppose so)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pepediaz said:
plot an inertial frame in the XY axis
I have difficulty understanding what you say here ? Usually, only one space coordinate is plotted, on the horizontal axis. The vertical axis is for ##ct##. Thus you get a space-time diagram - or a Minkowski diagram

pepediaz said:
on the photon's reference system
Does not exist
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pepediaz
Yes, I meant Minkowski diagram, I have said XY so convinced.

But we should plot the photon on an inertial frame, and also on the reference system on which the photon is at rest, isn't it? Or else, is it possible to plot a photon on Minkowski diagram?
 
pepediaz said:
The time in the inertial frame is greater than the time on the photon's reference system? (I suppose so)
The photon's reference frame? Is that the frame in which the photon is, ahem, at rest?
 
Yes
 
I rest my case.
 
Okay, there is some mistake there.
But I wanted to differentiate the inertial frame of the Earth (receiving a photon) and the frame which has proper time.
 
pepediaz said:
Okay, there is some mistake there.
But I wanted to differentiate the inertial frame of the Earth (receiving a photon) and the frame which has proper time.
If you compare the frequency of the photon received on Earth with the frequency at the source, you will know the relative velocity of source and Earth. The time as measured on the source frame would be the proper time. Does that make sense?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pepediaz
that's what I don't grasp. Photons travel at constant speed c, and the spaceship travels at 0.866c, so the photon should have its ct and x-axis at a slope of arctg(0.866) each, or it is placed on the light cone in Minkowski diagram?
 
  • #10
pepediaz said:
that's what I don't grasp. Photons travel at constant speed c, and the spaceship travels at 0.866c, so the photon should have its ct and x-axis at a slope of arctg(0.866) each, or it is placed on the light cone in Minkowski diagram?
No. For a photon ##ct=x## and that's a straight line at 45o on a ct cs. x diagram. The spaceship line would be between the ct axis and the x-axis at whatever angle is appropriate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pepediaz
  • #11
pepediaz said:
that's what I don't grasp. Photons travel at constant speed c, and the spaceship travels at 0.866c, so the photon should have its ct and x-axis at a slope of arctg(0.866) each, or it is placed on the light cone in Minkowski diagram?
What spaceship ? Are you feeding us your complete exercise problem statement in small bits ?

Read on in the link I gave, especially this part
 
  • #12
kuruman said:
No. For a photon ##ct=x## and that's a straight line at 45o on a ct cs. x diagram. The spaceship line would be between the ct axis and the x-axis at whatever angle is appropriate.
Nice, so for plotting a photon whose displacement I don't know, it's just a random point on the straight line at 45o on a ct cs. x diagram, isn't it?
 
  • #13
BvU said:
What spaceship ? Are you feeding us your complete exercise problem statement in small bits ?

Read on in the link I gave, especially this part
It wasn't my intention, the full statement is really long, with details which aren't related with this small problem. I haven't included the info about the spaceship, because I thought it is unnecessary for the photon motion, anyway I'll improve the statement, if I don't know how to solve it, I'm the last person to skip details.
 
  • #14
pepediaz said:
Nice, so for plotting a photon whose displacement I don't know, it's just a random point on the straight line at 45o on a ct cs. x diagram, isn't it?
I don't like the use of "random" here. Say you draw a line parallel to the x-axis at some finite time t. This will intersect the spaceship line and the photon line. The x-coordinates of the intersection points denote the position of the spaceship and the position of a photon that was emitted by the blastoff gases (more or less.)
 
  • #15
I get you, so, if we don't know the displacement of the photon (atmosphere thickness + some distance up to the spaceship when it was at the shortest distance to the Earth), we just can obtain a relationship between ct and ct' and another one for x and x', isn't it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K