Plotting Planets Orbits around Sun using Schwarzchild Metric

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on plotting the orbits of planets around the sun using the Schwarzschild metric in the context of general relativity. Participants explore the necessary initial conditions and units for the geodesic equations, as well as the implications of using geometrized units.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is attempting to plot planetary orbits and is seeking guidance on the initial conditions for (r, φ, t, r', φ', t'), particularly focusing on the values for r, r', and φ'.
  • Another participant explains that in the units where c=1, time can be measured in meters, and provides a conversion method for relating these units to standard SI units.
  • A different participant mentions that in geometrized units, mass can also be expressed in terms of length, and provides a conversion for the sun's mass to kilometers.
  • One participant discusses the conserved quantities in the Schwarzschild solution, specifically how energy and angular momentum relate to the geodesic equations, and suggests that the effective potential can be plotted to visualize circular orbits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the appropriate units and initial conditions, and while some concepts are clarified, there is no consensus on the best approach to take for the initial conditions or the implications of using different unit systems.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the specific values for initial conditions and the implications of using geometrized units versus standard units. The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of time and distance in the context of general relativity.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and researchers interested in general relativity, particularly those looking to understand the application of the Schwarzschild metric in plotting planetary orbits.

shifty89
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm currently studying general relatively and am trying to plot orbits of planets around the sun using the schwarzchild metric. I've worked out the geodesic equations, working with c=1 to simplify things, and written a MATLAB script to plot trajectories, but I'm struggling to work out what magnitudes or units to use.

Basically i need a vector of initial conditions for (r, \phi, t, r',\phi', t'), where r and \phi are the polar coordinates, t is time, r' is the speed in the r direction, etc. Obviously i can set \phi and t = 0 initially. I think t' = 1, i.e. initially time is traveling at the regular speed. This just leaves me with r, r', and \phi' to deal with.

i know that for mercury:
mass of sun = 2x10^30 kg
distance from sun = 5.8x10^10 m
orbital velocity = 4.8x10^3 m/s (would this be phi' ? or would i need to break it up into r and phi components... somehow?!)

but what units should i be working with in the relativistic units where c=1?
apologies if this kind of thing has been asked before or if it seems a little silly, but I am a maths student, we don't generally worry about units!

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK so c not only has value 1 it is also dimensionless in the units we would like to use. In order to achieve this we adopt a new unit for time, the meter! One meter of time is the time it takes light to travel 1m (of distance) (this is the opposite approach to the more familiar 'light year', whereby the measure distance in units usually reserved for time, you get the idea...)

c=(distance light travels in given time interval)/(the time interval)
c=1m/(time to travel 1m)
c=1m/1m=1

To convert from these weird units to the usual you can use 3x10^8 ms^-1=1, so 1s=3x10^8m and hence 1m of time =(1/(3x10^8))s

For less fundamental units than metres,seconds, kg and so on,such a joules and Newtons. For example 10J=10kgm^2s^-2, and since 1s=3x10^8m, s^-2=(9x10^16)^-1 m^-2, so we obtain 10J=1.1x10^-16kg

This is lifted from Schutz Ch1.

Another convention of seen in GR, Geometrized units, is when we set c=1 and G=1 (if we set hbar=1 we then get Planck units), in these units mass gets measured in length too, so as you have probably seen in the Schwarzschild solution 2m/r is dimensionless. Meaning the interval [ds^2]=L^2 (again because [dt^2]=L^2 too as we measure time in length)

The conversion factor is G/c^2 so the Sun's mass of 2x10^30kg is equal to 1.5km.

To see why:

[G]=L^3 M^-1 T^-2

we already had from [c]=1 that L=T, so we have:

[G]=L M^-1

and if now G is to be dimensionless it must also be that L=M so therefore mass is length. If G is also to be not just dimensionless but also 1, then it must be that:

1=(6.673x10^-11) m^3 kg^-1 s^-2
1=(6.673x10^-11) m^3 kg^-1 (9x10^16)^-1 m^-2
1=G/c^2 m/kg

Thus if this is to be 1, then 1kg=G/c^2 m, so 1kg is this fraction of 1 metre.

For a velocity such as the one you quoted, v=4.8x10^3 m/s, well again 1s=3x10^8m, so you need to divide through by a c to get v=1.6x10^-5 where [v]=1 (dimensionless now)
 
Last edited:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometrized_units

You can also simply put factors of c and G back in at the end. For example, if you obtained an expression like 1-v, the 1 is unitless, and the v is unitless in geometrized units. To convert it back to SI units, you'd have to insert a 1/c, making it 1-v/c.
 
I think t' = 1, i.e. initially time is traveling at the regular speed. This just leaves me with r, r', and LaTeX Code: \\phi ' to deal with.

Because of various symmetries (See Carroll ch5 available free online), you have various conserved quantities in the Schwarzschild solution, one of them is energy E, and it happens that \dot{t}=\frac{E}{1-\frac{2M}{r}}, you have have axial symmetry leading to the analogue of Kepler: \dot{\phi}=\frac{L}{r^2}

You are right to say that initial you can set t=0, phi=0 and this is because of these symmetries (you can't do the same with r- things depend on where you start in radial coordinate). Also because motion occurs in the plane, you can without loss of generality set theta=pi/2, which can massively simplifies your geodesic equations. At the end of all this you should find geodesic equation for timelike particles (in geometrized natural units):

\frac{1}{2}\dot{r}^2+\left[\frac{1}{2}-\frac{M}{r}+\frac{L^2}{2r^2}-\frac{ML^2}{r^3}\right]=\frac{E^2}{2}

You can get a good idea how these look and where the circular orbits are etc by plotting this effective potential.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
546
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K