Plotting points in three-dimensional space

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around plotting points in three-dimensional space, specifically focusing on the coordinates of four points: P(8,2,6), R(-2,16,-2), Q(3.9,2), and S(14/3, 20/3, 10/3). Participants are exploring the implications of a given proportion (2:1:3) in relation to these points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the meaning of the proportion 2:1:3 and how it relates to the points. There is discussion about plotting the points in 3D space and the necessity of visual representation for understanding their arrangement. Some participants suggest using distance calculations between vectors to determine relationships among the points.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing insights about plotting techniques and the relevance of distance calculations. Some have proposed alternative methods, such as using 2D projections, while others are still considering the implications of the 3D representation.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential confusion regarding the ordering of points without visual aids, as well as varying approaches to simplifying calculations, such as scaling coordinates. Participants are also reflecting on the adequacy of different dimensional representations for solving the problem.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1683080471365.png
,
The four points are,
##P(8,2,6)##
##R(-2,16,-2)##
##Q(3.9,2)##
##S(\frac{14}{3}, \frac{20}{3}, \frac{10}{3})##

And the solution is,
1683080840048.png

However, does someone please know what in the proportion 2:1:3 mean?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
However, does someone please know what in the proportion 2:1:3 mean?
1683084109408.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
renormalize said:
Thank you for your reply @renormalize !

I guess I can see where the comes from if we use a ruler to find the ratio.

However, how dose one know that without the drawing?

Many thanks!
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
However, how dose one know that without the drawing?
You are given the ##(x,y,z)## coordinates of each of the 4 points ##P,Q,R,S##. Can you can plot them in 3D space to see where they fall along the line? Do you know how to subtract two vectors to get their difference vector? And can you calculate the length of the difference vector to get the distance between the tips of those two vectors? (P.S.: "does" not "dose".)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave and member 731016
renormalize said:
You are given the ##(x,y,z)## coordinates of each of the 4 points ##P,Q,R,S##. Can you can plot them in 3D space to see where they fall along the line? Do you know how to subtract two vectors to get their difference vector? And can you calculate the length of the difference vector to get the distance between the tips of those two vectors? (P.S.: "does" not "dose".)
Thank you for your reply @renormalize !

True it would be hard to tell which points are in which order if we did not graph the points in 3D space. Oh I now see. So if we find the magnitude of the difference vector between adjacent points then we should be able to find the ratio between them.

Many thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave and renormalize
ChiralSuperfields said:
True it would be hard to tell which points are in which order if we did not graph the points in 3D space. Oh I now see. So if we find the magnitude of the difference vector between adjacent points then we should be able to find the ratio between them.
To help get the ordering, you can also find the distances between pairs of non-adjacent points. For example, the pair of points with the biggest distance between them must be at the ends.

To simplify the arithmetic, a 'trick' you could use is to change all coordinate-scales by a factor of 3 to get rid of the thirds.
##S' = (3*\frac{14}{3}, 3*\frac{20}{3}, 3*\frac{10}{3}) = (14, 20, 10)##
##P' = (3*8,3*2,3*6) = (24, 6, 18)##
etc.

The order and relative spacing of ##P', Q', R'##, and ##S'## are the same as those of ##P, Q, R## and ##S##. But you don't have to work with the messy thirds. (But if you are not completely clear why that works, stick to using thirds.)

EDIT. A simpler way to get the order is to find how far each point is from the origin.
That won't always work, so struck-through.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
ChiralSuperfields said:
However, how dose one know that without the drawing?
:H
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: member 731016, SammyS and Steve4Physics
I had fun plotting things -- and, being lazy, realized a 3D plot isn't necessary: 2D, e.g. the projection on the XY plane, is already enough:

1683127913287.png

1683127943610.png


##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016 and Steve4Physics
BvU said:
I had fun plotting things -- and, being lazy, realized a 3D plot isn't necessary: 2D, e.g. the projection on the XY plane, is already enough
In fact 1D is enough! Only the x-coordinates are required to answer the question. (Or alternatively, only the y or only the z ones.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016 and BvU

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K