Point belongs to the boundary - real analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving that the value 2 belongs to the set E defined as E={ (-1)n (8n+7)/(4n-1) : n ∈ℕ}. The user aims to demonstrate that the interval (2-r, 2+r) intersects with E and its complement. The key approach involves manipulating the expression (8n+7)/(4n-1) to show that there exists an N such that 2-r < 2 + 9/(4N-1) and 2 + 9/(4N-1) < 2+r, utilizing Archimedes' Principle to establish the existence of such an N.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real analysis concepts, particularly sequences and limits.
  • Familiarity with Archimedes' Principle in mathematical proofs.
  • Knowledge of manipulating inequalities and intervals.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and set theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of sequences in real analysis.
  • Learn about Archimedean properties and their applications in proofs.
  • Explore techniques for proving limits and convergence of sequences.
  • Investigate the concept of intervals and their intersections in set theory.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on real analysis, as well as anyone interested in understanding the intersection of sequences and limits in mathematical proofs.

Dassinia
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I have some trouble to solve this exercise

Homework Statement


E={ (-1)n (8n+7)/(4n-1) : n ∈ℕ}
Show that 2∈[PLAIN]http://www.ilemaths.net/img/smb-bleu/derivepartielle.gifE

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


We have to show that (2-r,2+r)∩ E ≠∅ and (2-r,2+r)∩ ℝ/E ≠∅
If I take the part where (-1)n=1 i will note it E''
We have
(8n+7)/(4n-1)=2+9/(4n-1)
I want to show that there is a point y so that y∈(2-r,2+r)∩ E'' i.e N :
2-r<2+9/(4N-1)
The thing is that we also have 2+r<2+9/(4N-1) but we are supposed to have 2+9/(4N-1) between 2-r and 2+r and then show that N ∃ by Archimedes' Principle, so what is wrong ?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Dassinia said:
I want to show that there is a point y so that y∈(2-r,2+r)∩ E'' i.e N :
2-r<2+9/(4N-1)
The thing is that we also have 2+r<2+9/(4N-1) but we are supposed to have 2+9/(4N-1) between 2-r and 2+r and then show that N ∃ by Archimedes' Principle, so what is wrong?
Why do you think ##2+r < 2+\frac{9}{4N-1}##? You get to choose N so that ##2+\frac{9}{4N-1} < 2+r## holds.
 
Thank you !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K