Point charges and force of repulsion

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force of repulsion between two point charges when their separation is reduced to 0.280 times the original distance. The relevant equation is Coulomb's law, F = (k * q1 * q2) / r^2, which indicates that the force scales inversely with the square of the distance (r). As the distance decreases, the force increases significantly; specifically, if r is reduced to 0.280, the force becomes approximately 12.8 times the original force. The mention of a negative sign is clarified as unnecessary in this context, as the force is inherently a repulsive force. Understanding the inverse square relationship is crucial for solving such problems.
kbyws37
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Two point charges are separated by a distance r and repel each other with a force F. If their separation is reduced to 0.280 times the original value, what is the magnitude of the force of repulsion between them?


I don't really understand this question and don't know where to start.
Would I start with the equation
E = ((k)(Q)/r^2

what follows next?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the equation for the repulsive force between two point charges, and how does it scale with r?
 
JeffKoch said:
What is the equation for the repulsive force between two point charges, and how does it scale with r?

It would be Coulomb's law of

F = ((k)(q1)(q2))/(r^2)

So it would be -0.280 times the original r value?

The final answer is 12.8 F but I still don't understand.
 
Where do you get the minus sign?

O.K., you know that F scales as 1/r^2. When r gets smaller, F must get larger. When r is half it's original value, how much larger does F get?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
947
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K