Point charges in a equilateral triangle - typo in solution?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the forces between three point charges of 11.0 µC located at the vertices of an equilateral triangle with a side length of 15.0 cm. The participants debate the correct application of trigonometric functions to determine the angles of the forces acting on each charge. Specifically, there is confusion regarding the use of arctan in calculating angles, with one participant suggesting that the force on charge 2 should be calculated first to simplify the analysis. The consensus is that the angle between the force and the positive x-axis should be reported, rather than the angle with respect to the y-axis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and force calculations between point charges.
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, particularly tangent and arctangent.
  • Knowledge of vector addition and force diagrams in physics.
  • Basic principles of symmetry in electrostatics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Coulomb's Law in multi-charge systems.
  • Learn how to construct and interpret force diagrams for point charges.
  • Explore the concept of vector resolution and how to calculate angles using trigonometric identities.
  • Investigate the effects of symmetry in electrostatic force calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving problems related to forces between point charges in a geometric configuration.

chopnhack
Messages
53
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Three point charges each carrying a charge of 11.0 µC are located at the corners of an equilateral triangle of side 15.0 cm. Calculate the magnitude and direction of the force on each charge.

Homework Equations


k = 9.0x109NM2C-2
F = k⋅(Q1⋅Q2)/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


See attached. My main problem lies with the solution provided which shows on ii) the solution for the left vertex as arctan of 41.9/72.6 whereas I got 72.6/41.9 as in tan = opp/adj. Is it a typo or have I totally missed the mark?
hw1q5.jpg
Lesson 2.1 Homework Solutions_Page_2.jpg

Lesson 2.1 Homework Solutions_Page_3.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't it easier to find the force on charge 2 first, and then use that to get the magnitude and direction of the forces on charges 1 and 3?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chopnhack
Hard to read, your writing is...
However, I think you could see from symmetry alone that the 30 degree angle (or 210, if you want), is correct. Not 240 !

Your division finds the angle between the y-axis and the force; we are used to reporting the angle between the force and the postiive x-axis...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chopnhack
Chestermiller said:
Isn't it easier to find the force on charge 2 first, and then use that to get the magnitude and direction of the forces on charges 1 and 3?
Hi Chester! I honestly picked the first vertex and went to work. Being that they are all equal charges, I didn't see the difference in locations.
Can you comment on my tan theta question?

Thanks as always.
 
BvU said:
Hard to read, your writing is...
However, I think you could see from symmetry alone that the 30 degree angle (or 210, if you want), is correct. Not 240 !

Your division finds the angle between the y-axis and the force; we are used to reporting the angle between the force and the postiive x-axis...

Sorry about that! The work was to only be for internal use and discarded, practice to understand the application - I literally have a dozen more of these to do before I will feel comfortable moving on to the next chapter and they each take quite a bit of time... so fast and sloppy it is!

I think I see what you mean, I believe that my force diagram is misdrawn... what I have labelled resultant in yellow is actually the extension of the force between 2 and 1... and the erased green line was correct - the resultant would have been drawn somewhere between them!

I am still having trouble visualizing the proper placement of the vectors to give me tan 41/72 though...

Thanks
 
Thanks all - I had to redraw to see it. Thank you again.
 
chopnhack said:
Hi Chester! I honestly picked the first vertex and went to work. Being that they are all equal charges, I didn't see the difference in locations.
Can you comment on my tan theta question?

Thanks as always.
I'm too lazy to look at that, since the problem is so much easier if the focus is on charge 2. For the other two charges, the direction will be the bisector of the included angle; that will be at an angle of 30 degrees to each of the two sides.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
38K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K