Pointwise & uniform boundednes

  • Thread starter Thread starter camillio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uniform
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Theorem 7.25 from Baby Rudin, which asserts that if K is compact and {f_n} is a sequence of continuous functions in C(K) that is pointwise bounded and equicontinuous, then {f_n} is uniformly bounded on K. The user questions whether equicontinuity is necessary for uniform boundedness, citing that continuous bounded functions on a compact space are uniformly continuous. They present a counterexample involving the sequence f_n(x) = nx/(x^2 + (1 - nx)^2) to illustrate their point, arguing that despite pointwise convergence, a global finite bound M cannot be established.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of compact spaces in topology
  • Familiarity with continuous functions and the space C(K)
  • Knowledge of pointwise boundedness and equicontinuity
  • Ability to analyze sequences of functions and convergence
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of equicontinuity in functional analysis
  • Examine examples of compact spaces and their properties
  • Learn about pointwise versus uniform convergence in sequences of functions
  • Explore counterexamples in functional analysis to deepen understanding
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, functional analysis, and topology, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to uniform boundedness and equicontinuity.

camillio
Messages
74
Reaction score
2
In Baby Rudin, Theorem 7.25 states:
If [itex]K[/itex] is compact, [itex]f_n \in C(K)[/itex] for [itex]n=1,2,3,...[/itex] and if [itex]{f_n}[/itex] is pointwise bounded and equicontinuous on [itex]K[/itex], then
(a) [itex]{f_n}[/itex] is uniformly bounded on [itex]K[/itex]

The theorem continues with point (b), which I understand.

My question is, whether point (a) needs the equicontinuity, since:
* [itex]C(K)[/itex] is a set of continuous bounded functions on a compact space, i.e. uniformly continuous, hence there is no function [itex]g[/itex] s.t. [itex]g(x) \to \infty[/itex].
* if the previous holds, then by the hypothesis of pointwise boundedness of [itex]\{f_n\}[/itex], there must exist a number [itex]\sup_{x \in K, n=1,2,3,...} |f_n(x)| = M<\infty[/itex], [itex]x\in K[/itex] arbitrary and hence the uniform boundedness should hold.

Am I wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The sequence

[itex]f_n:[0,1]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}:x\rightarrow \frac{nx}{x^2+(1-nx)^2}[/itex]

seems to be a counterexample to your claim. See example 7.21 of Rudin, I modified it a bit.
 
Thanks a lot! I assume, that the reason is that [itex]f_n[/itex] converges pointwise for every [itex]x\in K[/itex], but due to the points [itex]1/n[/itex] in your example, it is impossible to find a global finite [itex]M[/itex] s.t. [itex]|f_n(x)| \leq M[/itex] for all [itex]x \in K[/itex]. Right?

I really do not understand why usually things go quite well, but at some moments I get stuck with (obvious?) things :(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K