Poisson Brackets / Levi-Civita Expansion

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 5K views
Bismar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am stumped by how to expand/prove the following identity,

[tex]\{L_i ,L_j\}=\epsilon_{ijk} L_k[/tex]

I am feeling that my knowledge on how to manipulate the Levi-Civita is not up to scratch.

Am i correct in assuming,

[tex]L_i=\epsilon_{ijk} r_j p_k[/tex]
[tex]L_j=\epsilon_{jki} r_k p_i[/tex]

Which follows on to,

[tex]\{L_i ,L_j\}=\{\epsilon_{ijk} r_j p_k,\epsilon_{jki} r_k p_i\}[/tex]

And then I'm stuck. I'm assuming the Kronecker Delta identities with the Levi-Civita work into it in some way, but i do not understand how/why.

I can work it out if i expanded the Levi-Civita to such,

[tex]L_1=r_2 p_3 - r_3 p_2[/tex]
[tex]L_2=r_3 p_1 - r_1 p_3[/tex]
[tex]L_3=r_1 p_2 - r_2 p_1[/tex]

But then that's trivial... :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I'm afraid i do not understand, where does that get you?

[tex]\epsilon_{ikl} \epsilon_{jmn}(\frac{dr_k p_l}{dr_o} \frac{dr_m p_n}{dp_o} - \frac{dr_m p_n}{dr_o} \frac{dr_k p_l}{dp_o})[/tex]

[tex]= \epsilon_{ikl} \epsilon_{jmn}(\delta_{ko}\delta_{no}p_l r_m -\delta_{mo}\delta_{lo} p_n r_k)[/tex]

If that's even right, which I'm sure isn't, I'm stuck again.
 
[tex] \begin{split}<br /> \{L_a,L_b\} &=\epsilon_{acd} \epsilon_{bef} \{x_c p_d,x_e p_f\} \\<br /> &= \epsilon_{acd} \epsilon_{bef} (\{x_c,x_e p_f \} p_d+x_c \{p_d,x_e p_f \}) \\<br /> &= \epsilon_{acd} \epsilon_{bef}(x_e p_d\delta_{cf} -x_c p_f \delta_{de}) \\<br /> &= \epsilon_{acd} \epsilon_{bec} x_e p_d - \epsilon_{acd} \epsilon_{bdf} x_c p_f \\<br /> &=[(-\delta_{ab} \delta_{de}+\delta_{ae} \delta_{db}) x_e p_d+ (\delta_{ab} \delta_{cf} - \delta_{af} \delta_{cb}) x_c p_f] \\<br /> &= -\delta_{ab} \vec{x} \cdot \vec{p} + x_a p_b+\delta_{ab} \vec{x} \cdot \vec{p} -x_b p_a \\<br /> &=x_a p_b-x_b p_a=\epsilon_{abc} L_c<br /> \end{split}[/tex]