Polar coordinates and mechanics question.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanics of a bead threaded on a smooth rod rotating with a constant angular velocity, denoted as ω. The key equations involved include Newton's second law expressed as \(\ddot{r} - r\dot{\theta}^2 = 0\) and the motion described by the radial vector R, which can be decomposed into x and y components. The solutions for R are derived from the second derivative equating to itself multiplied by a constant, leading to functions such as sine, cosine, and exponential forms like \(e^{\omega t}\). The participants clarify notation issues and provide insights into the derivation process, emphasizing the importance of understanding the relationship between angular and radial motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and their application in mechanics
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic knowledge of derivatives and differential equations
  • Proficiency in vector decomposition in two-dimensional space
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of polar coordinates in mechanics
  • Learn about the applications of Newton's second law in rotational motion
  • Explore solutions to second-order differential equations
  • Investigate the relationship between angular velocity and radial motion
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of rotational motion and the mathematical principles underlying mechanics.

In_Development
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Alright, the problem here is that I seem unable to grasp an example given in class. I am not sure if this is due to not copying it down correctly, or if there's something I am just missing. Either way, I know I am not the only one who has had a bit of trouble with this. I'm hoping that someone with a greater knowledge of physics can spot what is going on.

Homework Statement


Bead threaded on a smooth rod (i.e. no friction) which rotates with constant angular velocity [tex]\omega[/tex] about one end. Investigate the motion.

Where r is a radial vector,

[tex]\dot{r}[/tex]=0, [tex]\dot{\theta}[/tex]=[tex]\omega[/tex], and r=r[tex]_{0}[/tex] at t=0

The dot above the letters and symbols, as far as I am aware, just denotes the first derivative (in case this isn't a standard notation of some sort). Also, the subscript doesn't seem to be working in the preview, so in case it does not turn out right, that is meant to be a subcript zero, not r^0. It's just denoting a particular distance up the rod that the bead is.

Homework Equations


Now this is the working out that I copied.

Newtons second law:
[tex]\ddot{r}[/tex] -r[tex]\dot{\theta}[/tex]^2 = 0.

(I realize Newton's second law should include a multiplication by mass, but I'm just writing the information I have). r dot dot is the second derivative I believe.

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\theta[/tex] = [tex]\omega[/tex]t

[tex]\dot{\theta}[/tex] = [tex]\omega[/tex] ; [tex]\ddot{r}[/tex] = [tex]\omega[/tex]*r[tex]^{2}[/tex]

Solutions:
e^wt and e^-wt

Oh, the omega is not meant to be superscript throughout the question by the way, I don't know why it is; and the w in the 'solution' represents an omega. So it is e to the power of omega*time.

All I need to know is what on Earth the solutions are for and how did they materialise?

EDIT: I really made a mess of this whole latex thing.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let ω=omega θ=theta, r' = dr/dt, r'' = d^2r/dt^2 (second derivative) Let R be the vector , and r be the length.
I'm not sure how you got to Newton's second law but here's how my professor proved it:
R can be broken down into x and y components as such:
R = rcosθ*i + rsinθ*j (i,j, are unit vectors along x and y)

Let's take the derivative twice (Keep in mind that this is with respect to t)
R' = -rsinθ*θ'*i + rcosθ*θ*'j
R'' = -rcosθ*θ'^2*i - rsinθ*θ'^2*j

Hey! That looks like our original R almost:
R'' = -Rθ''
R'' + Rθ'^2 = 0 <---matches your notes except for the sign..
Keep in mind that θ' = ω so:
R'' + R(ω^2) = 0

I haven't taken differential equations and I'm guessing you haven't either. But in general if you want to solve for R but you know that its second derivative is itself times a constant, then there are only a few functions that do that: sine, cosine, and e^x. You "guess" that the solution is e^ωt. If you take the derivative twice, indeed, it is itself times a constant (ω^2).

The solutions are for R. Sorry I don't know why I had issues with the signs, but they should be right otherwise.
 
Anadyne said:
Let ω=omega θ=theta, r' = dr/dt, r'' = d^2r/dt^2 (second derivative) Let R be the vector , and r be the length.
I'm not sure how you got to Newton's second law but here's how my professor proved it:
R can be broken down into x and y components as such:
R = rcosθ*i + rsinθ*j (i,j, are unit vectors along x and y)

Let's take the derivative twice (Keep in mind that this is with respect to t)
R' = -rsinθ*θ'*i + rcosθ*θ*'j
R'' = -rcosθ*θ'^2*i - rsinθ*θ'^2*j

Hey! That looks like our original R almost:
R'' = -Rθ''
R'' + Rθ'^2 = 0 <---matches your notes except for the sign..
Keep in mind that θ' = ω so:
R'' + R(ω^2) = 0

I haven't taken differential equations and I'm guessing you haven't either. But in general if you want to solve for R but you know that its second derivative is itself times a constant, then there are only a few functions that do that: sine, cosine, and e^x. You "guess" that the solution is e^ωt. If you take the derivative twice, indeed, it is itself times a constant (ω^2).

The solutions are for R. Sorry I don't know why I had issues with the signs, but they should be right otherwise.

Ah thanks for the help, because my professor gave no explanation whatsoever on how he got from one step to the other.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K