Polar coordinates of solar system

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around plotting the positions of the three inner planets—Venus, Earth, and Mars—on polar graph paper for an astronomy assignment. There is confusion regarding the direction of the planets' movement, with some participants noting that the table suggests a clockwise rotation, which contradicts the expected counter-clockwise movement in standard polar coordinates. Clarifications indicate that in polar coordinates, the zero angle is typically at the right, and angles are measured counter-clockwise from there. The participants discuss the implications of these conventions on understanding planetary visibility and positions in the sky. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of adhering to established conventions in polar coordinate systems for accurate astronomical plotting.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
24,120
Reaction score
8,255
I was perusing an astronomy homework site and came across a question in which they are asked to plot the positions of the 3 inner planets on polar graph paper. They are then asked questions about visibility and time of day in Earth's sky.

The table:
Code:
[FONT="Courier New"]
Location Venus Earth Mars
   1      280   270   310
   2      325   300   324
   3       18   330   338
   4       68     0   352
   5      115    30     6
   6      165    60    20
   7      213    90    34

What strikes me as odd about this table is that it has the planets going around the sun clockwise. Either
- this is to be viewed from below the solar system's South pole looking up
- the sequence of 7 is last to first.
- the graph coords should be labelled in counterclockwise direction
Whichever way, it's going to be pretty confusing to figure out when the planets can be seen when.

Am I missing something?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Mayby I'm missing something, but if you use the standard polar conversion

\left(x,y\right) = r \left(\cos(\theta), \sin(\theta) \right)

the planets do go counter-clockwise as expected. For instance, Earth go from from a position on the negative y-axis at 1, over a position at the positive x-axis at 4, to a position on the positive y-axis at 7 (around half a year).
 
Filip Larsen said:
Mayby I'm missing something, but if you use the standard polar conversion

\left(x,y\right) = r \left(\cos(\theta), \sin(\theta) \right)

the planets do go counter-clockwise as expected. For instance, Earth go from from a position on the negative y-axis at 1, over a position at the positive x-axis at 4, to a position on the positive y-axis at 7 (around half a year).

Ah. Ok, so c] the coords are labelled counterclockwise, (and if I understand you correctly, 0 is at the bottom.)

I'd just assumed I'd start with 0 at the top and label degrees clockwise around the graph. But it appears there is a convention to polar coords then.

Thanks.
 
UC Berkely, December 16, 2025 https://news.berkeley.edu/2025/12/16/whats-powering-these-mysterious-bright-blue-cosmic-flashes-astronomers-find-a-clue/ AT 2024wpp, a luminous fast blue optical transient, or LFBOT, is the bright blue spot at the upper right edge of its host galaxy, which is 1.1 billion light-years from Earth in (or near) a galaxy far, far away. Such objects are very bright (obiously) and very energetic. The article indicates that AT 2024wpp had a peak luminosity of 2-4 x...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 142 ·
5
Replies
142
Views
134K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
638
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
18K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K