Polarization Confusion: Plane of Vibration vs Plane of Polarization

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between the plane of polarization and the plane of vibration in the context of electromagnetic waves. The plane of vibration contains the electric field (E) and wave vector (k) vectors, while the plane of polarization is defined by the orientation of the electric field, which can vary based on the medium, such as in fiber-optic modes. The confusion arises from different interpretations in literature, particularly regarding the relationship between these planes and their representation in various coordinate systems. A more accurate depiction of polarization involves plotting it as a function of position rather than relying solely on Cartesian planes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave theory
  • Familiarity with vector representation in physics
  • Knowledge of fiber-optic technology and its modes
  • Basic skills in graphing and visualizing three-dimensional data
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical representation of electromagnetic waves in different media
  • Explore the concept of polarization modes in fiber optics
  • Learn about 3D graphing techniques for visualizing wave polarization
  • Study the differences between linear, circular, and elliptical polarization
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, optical engineers, and students studying electromagnetic theory, particularly those interested in wave polarization and fiber-optic applications.

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
Can anyone clearly say what is the difference between plane of polarization and plane of vibration?
I know what is the latter.It is the plane containig E and k vectors.But Regarding the first one I am a bit confused:Different literatures treat them differently...Sometimes it appears that they are the same and sometimes it appears that it is perpendicular to the direction of k.That is the plane where the E field appears linear/circular/elliptical.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The plane of polarisation is the plane defined by E and k.

I think the confusion here stems from the fact that it is possible to polarisation to vary as a function of position, for example fibre-optic modes are typically radially (E pointing radially outward) and tangentially polarised. In these cases, the plane of polarisation will also vary as a function of position, thus it can be somewhat of a hindrance describing the polarisation of such modes using planes. A better way to show the polarisation of the mode is to plot the polarisation as a function of position, which is why you see plenty of graphs with coordinate planes that are perpendicular to k. I don't agree though that this is the plane where E appears linear/circular/elliptical though - E can only be shown to rotate using a 3D graph or some other parametric space, not in a cartesian plane.

Claude.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
18K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K