Pole in Stereographic Projection

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
FallenApple
Messages
564
Reaction score
61
So the circle minus the pole is homeomorphic to the number line. Does that mean that the pole itself represents a number that doesn't exist on the real line? After all, the pole certainly exists and yet is the only point that isn't mapped.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FallenApple said:
So the circle minus the pole is homeomorphic to the number line. Does that mean that the pole itself represents a number that doesn't exist on the real line? After all, the pole certainly exists and yet is the only point that isn't mapped.
The pole corresponds to the point at infinity, which results is the projective number line. You have to define some point as pole, since ##\mathbb{S}^1 \simeq SO(2,\mathbb{R}) \simeq U(1,\mathbb{C}) \simeq \mathbb{P}(1,\mathbb{R})## is the unit circle, which is not the same topological space as ##\mathbb{R}^1##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FallenApple