Stereographic projection in de Sitter cosmological model

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Stereographic projection, while conformal, is not isometric and is often misunderstood in the context of general relativity (GR). In 1917, de Sitter utilized stereographic projection to derive metrics in static coordinates, which raises questions about its applicability in GR. However, any coordinate transformation in GR is valid as long as it is a diffeomorphism, meaning that the underlying spacetime remains consistent and solutions to the field equations are preserved. This discussion clarifies that conformal transformations differ from mere coordinate changes, as they can alter the metric while keeping points fixed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity principles and terminology
  • Familiarity with diffeomorphisms in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of metric tensors and their transformations
  • Basic concepts of conformal transformations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of diffeomorphisms in general relativity
  • Explore the mathematical framework of metric tensors and their transformations
  • Learn about conformal transformations and their applications in theoretical physics
  • Investigate de Sitter's cosmological model and its significance in modern cosmology
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, cosmologists, and students of general relativity seeking to deepen their understanding of coordinate transformations and their implications in cosmological models.

ahmad2l
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
We know stereographic projection is conformal but it isn't isometic and in general relativity it can not be used because in this theory general transformations must be isometric. But de sitter in his model (1917) used it (stereographic projection) to obtain metric in static coordinates. How can it be explained
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ahmad2l said:
in general relativity it can not be used because in this theory general transformations must be isometric.

Not true. In GR, any change of coordinates is legal as long as it's a diffeomorphism. There is no additional requirement.

In GR, when you do a change of coordinates, you change both the coordinates and the elements of the metric tensor itself. The result is that everything automatically still remains consistent. You're still describing the same spacetime, and it's still a solution to the field equations. All you've done is relabel everything. As a simple exampls, if you take Minkowski space and rescale all the coordinates by a factor of 1/2, and the metric was (+1,-1,-1,-1) in the original coordinates, then the metric in the new coordinates is (+4,-4,-4,-4).

When you talk about things like conformal transformations, you're not talking about a change of coordinates. It's more than a relabeling. For example, you can define a conformal transformation like [itex]g\rightarrow \Omega^2 g[/itex], while still leaving all the points fixed and describing them with the same coordinates. Or, alternatively, you can define conformal transformations that send points to other points, while leaving the metric the same. (This is how people typically think about conformal transformations in the complex plane.)
 
thank you bcrowell. you saved me
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
658
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K