Political Party Switching in [Country Name]: Chart & Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter jkeatin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a political party switching model in a specified country, involving three parties: the conservative Butter-side-up party, the radical Butter-side-down party, and the progressive Pitapocket party. Participants are tasked with creating a transition matrix to represent the party-switching process and analyzing the long-term distribution of party affiliation among the population.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of the transition matrix and question the correctness of initial attempts. There are inquiries about whether to reduce the matrix equation or to find eigenvalues and eigenvectors to analyze the long-term behavior of the system. Some participants also reflect on the interpretation of "long run" in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different mathematical approaches to the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the long-term distribution, but there is no explicit consensus on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is an emphasis on understanding the implications of the transition matrix and the long-term distribution without providing direct solutions.

jkeatin
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
In a certain country, there are three political parties: The conservative Butter-side-up party
(the Uppers), the radical Butter-side-down party (the Downers), and the progressive Pitapocket
party (the Pocketeers). Recent polls show that each year, 70% of Uppers remain
Uppers, 80% of Downers remain Downers, 40% of Pocketeers remain Pocketeers. Everyone
else switches, and they divide equally among the other two parties.
(a) Write the transition matrix representing the party-switching process.
(b) In the long run, how will the people be distributed among the political parties?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried?
 
.7 .15 .15
.8 .2 .2
.4 .3 .3


is that say matrix A?
 
No, that's not correct. Assuming (A, B, C) means that one year A% uppers, B% downers, C% pitas, then you must have
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} \\ a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} \\ a_{31} & a_{32} & a{_33}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}1.0 \\ 0.0 \\ 0.0\end{array}\right]= \left[\begin{array}{c} 0.7 \\ 0.15 \\ 0.15\end{array}\right][/tex]

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} \\ a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} \\ a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}0.0 \\ 1.0 \\ 0.0\end{array}\right]= \left[\begin{array}{c} 0.1 \\ 0.8 \\ 0.1\end{array}\right][/tex]
and
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} \\ a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} \\ a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}0.0 \\ 0.0 \\ 1.0\end{array}\right]= \left[\begin{array}{c} 0.3 \\ 0.3 \\ 0.4\end{array}\right][/tex]

You can determine the "a"s from that.
 
.7 .1 .3
.15 .8 .3
.15 .1 .4





then do i just reduce the matrix equation and find the values?
 
or do i find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors?
 
jkeatin said:
or do i find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors?
Have you tried what Halls suggested?
 
jkeatin said:
.7 .1 .3
.15 .8 .3
.15 .1 .4





then do i just reduce the matrix equation and find the values?

jkeatin said:
or do i find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors?
C'mon now, you are not coming to this having no idea what you are doing are you? WHY would you "reduce the matrix equation" (what matrix equation) or "find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors"? What would either of those tell you?

Intrepret "in the long run as meaning "after many years". After n years, You will have An X where X is the initial distribution. How can you most easily find An for large n?

Mark44 said:
Have you tried what Halls suggested?
He did- in post #5.
 
I took .7 , .8 , and .4 and subtracted 1 from each, then i got x1=6t x2=3t and x3=t
so 60% uppers, 30% downers 10% pocketeers, is that close or am i just way off
 
  • #10
What reasoning did you use to arrive at that answer?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K