Polynomial Ring, Show I is prime but not maximal

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the ideal I = (x) in the polynomial ring R = Z[x] is a prime ideal but not a maximal ideal. The proof involves demonstrating that the quotient ring R/I is an integral domain, indicating that I is prime, and showing that R/I is not a field, confirming that I is not maximal. Key strategies include simplifying the representation of R/I and exploring isomorphic rings to facilitate the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial rings, specifically Z[x]
  • Knowledge of ideals in ring theory, particularly prime and maximal ideals
  • Familiarity with quotient rings and their properties
  • Basic skills in constructing isomorphisms between algebraic structures
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of prime and maximal ideals in ring theory
  • Learn about quotient rings and their role in algebra
  • Explore isomorphisms in algebraic structures, focusing on polynomial rings
  • Practice proving integral domains and fields through examples
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, particularly those studying ring theory, as well as educators and tutors seeking to deepen their understanding of polynomial ideals and their properties.

Rederick
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let R = Z[x] be a polynomial ring where Z is the integers. Let I = (x) be a principal ideal of R generated by x. Prove I is a prime ideal of R but not a maximal ideal of R.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I want to show that R/I is an integral domain which implies I is a prime ideal and that R/I is NOT a field which implies I is not a maximal ideal.
I'm not sure how to represent R/I to show those two things. I know R/I = f(x) +I but I don't know where to go from there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rederick said:
I'm not sure how to represent R/I to show those two things. I know R/I = f(x) +I but I don't know where to go from there.
For any particular polynomial f, the element represented by f(x) + I also has many other representations as g(x) + I for other polynomials g. It is often helpful to simplify things; maybe it will suggest something.

An alternative would be to guess a ring that is isomorphic to the quotient R/I, and try to write down the isomorphism, then try to prove both directions are well-defined.

If all else fails, you could try doing arithmetic in R/I to gain familiarity with it, or maybe try to prove directly from the definitions of everything involved that R/I is an integral domain that is not a field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K